Search results

i do not think that the sentence for the teacher is harsh,its the sentence of hall that is to lenient.i think its a small but important point in relation to your post.

you are right there is no evidence of her mouth being tapped or any kind of carpet and she did go on her own free will.child abduction does not require any of these things.it means that this man took a minor without the consent of said minors parents/guardians.it may seem frivolous but it is a...

the stuart hall case should not be compared to this one they have so many different aspects to them(also i believe the authorities are looking to appeal on the grounds of a lenient sentence so he may have more time added,i hope.) if the scenario was reversed and it was a woman teacher and a...

so what if he has no images on his computer or that he may or may not have been in a loveless marriage or whether she was mature for her age.he was her teacher in a unique position of power and trust and he failed to dispense both those responsibilites.whether or not they loved each other or...

i believe he was only charged with abduction because he was arrested in france.sex with 15 yr olds is legal there.sussex police could only extradite him under the terms of a european arrest warrant which meant that he could only be charged with abduction of a minor which is also illegal under...

it is abduction as defined under the law,she was a minor and he took her(willing or otherwise)without her parents/guardians consent

he was grooming this child since she was 14.as a father of a girl the same age i hope he goes to jail for a long time whether there was consent is irrelevant he is a teacher and in a position of power and he has failed in his responsibilities. i hope the op was just fishing with some of the...