It's almost word for word the same.
Anyway, the boys are happy in their skirts. The headt teacher is happy for them to wear skirts. Non-story, no problem.
That I SUSPECT the Daily Mail isn't reporting the whole story in a non-crime related story where no crime has been alleged? . No, I don't think I'll be having to justify that comment.
I still believe there is more to this story than is being reported. If the school rules state shorts can be worn in very hot weather then I SERIOUSLY doubt the 20 boys would have been sent home for just wearing shorts. I suspect it was probably their reaction/ attitude on initially being...
They'd have had more impact turning up in shorts. Anyway, I've giving these children enough of my time already. Hpoefuly they'll get excluded then they can wear a tutu and cabbage leaves in their ears if it makes them happy.
Yep, it would appear so. Actualy rather than send them home I hope the teachers didn't say a word to them and just let them get on with it. It's like going to a fancy dress party, funny for the first 20 mins of attention. Dull after that. Then feel stupid.
I'll try and explain it so you can understand.
The school rules say you CAN wear shorts. The headteacher says you CANNOT wear shorts. So, what I am saying is wear shorts to rebel. You can then point out to the headmaster that you are following the rules. End of non-story.
You clearly admire...
Personally I think they are idiots. I I were the headteacher I would have sent them home. If I were their parents I wouldn't have let them leave the house.