Search results

i personally do agree with you, but for some of the purists on here, we could sign Ibrahimovic or Messi on a free transfer when they are 34 or 35 for a season or 2 on 20k a week and they wouldnt be satisfied

NO NO NO your absolutely wrong, hes past it and wouldnt be able to play more than 6 games a season, and of course you should never have a player back at a club once hes left regardless of the situation, plus youve forgotten he would want at least 20k a week and Berk would never agree to this...

i do agree, in fact even at 10k a week, if he had an impact for 5 games, and helped us get promotion, we paid out more to vicente in the time he was here and he barely impacted in 5 games didnt he?

its ok to say pay as you play deals dont exist, but with FFP, surely a lot of older players are going to lower their demands, because they and there agents realise that clubs will not be able to spend over their budget

sometimes as well as youth you need a couple of older experienced pros to steady the ship

yes as most of the budget is spent on a large amount of pies for Barber and Berk to gorge themselves on

perhaps that is where all the money has gone, wonder if tony bloom invested in a crystal ball for BERK ?????

yes but if we sold ulloa for 6.5 million, would you spend 2 or 3 million on a decent striker to play up front with Zamora, or rotate between CMS, Zamora, plus another decent striker ????

my personal opinion is yes id have him back but only on a pay as you play deal, but if it involved a gauaranteed hefty weekly salary then NO

i cant see any club foolish enough to give him anywhere near the salary hes on at the moment based on his age and his fitness record in the last 2 seasons

Hi, with Zamora getting into the twilight of his career and suffering fitness issues and the ability to play a full 90 minutes, if he was available on a pay as you play deal, would you have him back ????