I've only done it once before. I didn't even post my column when I wrote a piece on NSC, which I ran past Darren first.
If you consider me self-serving then perhaps - in regards to actually wanting people to read it - I am.
I prefer to think of it like this: I've written a piece on the Albion...
Er, no. Can you not read?
I've explained, more than once, what the piece was about.
'Self-serving'?! What's the point in writing an article if no-one reads it?
I write for a living, and have done for over 15 years.
My articles are meant to be fillers. Sometimes nostalgic, sometimes quirky, and sometimes - in some people's opinions - shit.
They are written for a weekly newspaper - i.e. online isn't the priority - so have to be a certain type of...
This is the second time I've posted an article of mine and I've been doing it six months now.
It's has nothing to do with 'click baiting'. I don't even know what that is!
It comes out in print so the web bit is an aside.
Seriously, what does it have to do with REMF??!
You're clearly on the...
I wrote it.
Leon Knight isn't an afterthought. The headline, again, reads The Good (listed), The Bad (Farrington, Mahoney-J), The... (Knight). I think it's 'plenty' clear, to be fair.
Thanks for highlighting C- as your mark. I must do better next time.
As proven by the scores of appalling strikers on this thread, the article clearly isn't a list of bad strikers - only a few are mentioned.
Knight scored goals, but caused a multitude of problems off the pitch.
The headline states: 'The Good, The Bad, and The...'
You mean the bit where it says:
"Then there’s Leon Knight. An undoubted talent but a very disruptive influence. He can now be found plying his trade at Barnton, level ten of the football pyramid."