Search results

So two chavs have six kids and live off the state. They knew this before they had those kids. Cutting four lots of child benefit could put the family before the poverty line. Equally, if we had a limit of child benefit for two kids, and those chavs had more which meant they ended up below the...

I tend to agree. Anyone talking about common sense ignores the simple fact that everybody has a different frame of reference as to what common sense actually means. Classic oft-used example: 1) We should restrict child benefit to the first 2 children only. It's common sense that we shouldn't...

Jesus Christ, if having a smaller street sign in a foreign language below the one in English is a massive problem for you in your life, I'll have whatever your having. This goes on in countries all over the world. There are parts of Canada where street signs are in Japanese but not in French...

You don't know that. It hasn't worked out for the noddy economies in southern Europe (or Italy), but who is to say we wouldn't have been more like Germany or Benelux? I'm actually just pointing out that I am unlikely to have used the term "small minded little Englanders" to those against the...

I could say the same thing about your comment on my post after I said UKIP could well return to being a total irrelevance.

Nope, because I haven't been for joining the Euro for about a decade! I was initially pro Euro but changed my view after about 2 years.

??? Equally, they could lose that seat in Portsmouth after holding it for less than 2 years, not win any seats anywhere else and go back to being little more than a pressure group. And here are the results of the 2010 election from Portsmouth South: Liberal Democrat Mike Hancock 18,921 45.9...

I'm afraid they are. They might influence mainstream party policy but they have no influence on the decisions being made at national level. And where does this idea that the three main parties are "crapping themselves" at the the thought of UKIP gaining a single seat come from? Did they "crap...

What a complete load of shite. UKIP would then have ONE MP. Big deal. As it is, they haven't got any, and never have had. And who is to say they'd win that anyway? If recent by-elections are anything to go by, they will do what they always do and finish a solid second or third by hoovering...

Since when has Brighton & Hove Albion been a government agency?

*sigh* You're a pointless sad act. The fact that four of us accusing you of lying is good enough for me. Oh and I'm neither right wing or anti-EU. I just think youre an idiot.

The last third of this thread has been all about you lying, back-pedalling and lying again, but contributing nothing to the discussion. People have been banned for less.

Absolutely pathetic. You have nothing to say.

Back pedalling as usual. You got pulled up, so then directed me to the "UKIP founder", but even then he's got nothing to do with UKIP. This is how you opened up this conversation: It's odd, your position on UKIP is broadly similar to mine yet you are by far the most annoying clown on the thread.

The fact is, you labelled something "a flagship policy" in an effort to discredit people you oppose rather than sticking to the facts. You have done this by quoting someone who has no relevance to UKIP any more. It is simply NOT true to say banning the burqa is the flagship UKIP policy. That...

Yes. This sounds like a "flagship policy" to me. :rolleyes:

Christ, you really are thick. Sked may have founded UKIP but is now an opponent. What you have done is the equivalent of me asking Ed Milliband to describe Tory policy and present it as fact. The only tit on here is you, but you're the only one who can't see it.

I don't agree with that at all. I think the Tories do certainly. And there are people in the Labour party who do too, but not to the same significant level. As for the Lib Dems, you were massively clutching at straws when you mentioned them earlier just as you are now - they are an openly PRO...

Yes they are. You said "UKIPs flagship policy was to ban the burqa". Clearly that is NOT and never has been their "flagship" policy. And no, you don't really make me bite because you're not worth responding to IMO - if you were I would have posted on your other tediously long thread. I just...

UKIP's flagship policy was to leave the EU you massive massive bellend. You really are a total nob most of the time.