On the other side of the coin, more rigorous drug-testing could hamper Russia and China, while a spread of medals across a broader range of sports for GB will attract greater funding and, hence, better training facilities for Team GB.
I agree that - US apart - the rest of the world will catch...
I thought Rio put on a great games, shame no one turned up to watch it apart from the tourists.
As for Team GB, a better medal haul, medals in more sports, even the swimmers performed. I see no reason why this can't continue in Tokyo, bring it on.
We also saw the nadir of the Games last night, the women's high jump won with 1m 97 by a 37 year old Spaniard, a height beaten by even heptathlon athletes including our own KJT. Maybe she should enter the high jump in Tokyo 2020?
Andy Murray is such a class act, showing max respect to Del Potro at the end of the match. A long embrace between the two players borne out of mutual respect and genuine fatigue, two boxers punched out.
I take that point. The IOC bottled it, they lost sight of what the Olympic spirit is all about. That said, I think that through more rigorous testing the IOC can break the back of the problem, whereas the endemic cheating in football will never be removed.
One of the reasons Olympic football doesn't work for me is the endemic cheating in the game. The diving, the feigning injury, the shirtpulling and holding at corners, pressurising the officials etc. The inclusion of football taints the Olympic brand.
The acid test of whether a sport deserves to be in the Olympics is how badly the players and participants themselves want it to be included.
A second worthy consideration is whether or not you get a full turnout from the world's best player and participants - for me, a sports like tennis or...