Search results

It’s madness to accept a buy back and a sell on, hope they read the small print and don’t have to pay a sell on if they sell back to Liverpool ! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Palace are now the front runners according to the press. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agree the buy back has to be mutually beneficial otherwise what’s the point! One club takes all the risk and loses out (cost of a replacement) if he comes good, although that might be the only terms Liverpool have offered and sheff United are happy with the risk (maybe we are not and rightly...

Wasn’t the extra year agreed in the January window where we didn’t sign a striker and Forest started showing an interest. It was the right decision based on the circumstances at the time, but we have to concede this was brought about us not signing a replacement then and we are in a similar...

He claims our bid was heavily structured, Haven’t found anything right on his timeline to suggest in the know. 3,000 followers speaks volumes Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’m happy with Piglets Pantry thanks Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Would Liverpool sell or loan to Spurs though, they aren’t a title contender but it would put them as top 6? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He would need to want to go back though Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk