Search results

I agree, he continually updates his stance on the process to ensure that his previous statements are 'developed' (corrected) to reflect what he 'understands' (has been told by someone that may/may not be close to the situation) - it must be exhausting and extremely time consuming. However...

That theory would suggest there's no revenue benefit from a new stadium compared to a toilet, which goes against popular belief. If the difference is only ticket sales then what's the point investing in stadia?

When you look at both clubs, the state and capacity of the stadia, ticket prices, the outlets within the ground and what they generate etc etc 20% seems small to me. Palace beer/food generation must be tiny in comparison to Albion, corporate income too. Who would want to use Selhurst for...

Revenue/income I meant. Totally agree with everything else but unless they are printing money (quite possible with those crooks) I can't see why our revenue is not also streets ahead/above.

Revenue. Clear as day in the other metrics but revenue (outside of player sales) not as marked a difference. Really odd, should be at least 50% above those arsehats I'd have thought

But we should be streets ahead of clubs like Palace, but we don't seem to be. I find that baffling.