Search results

I think most of us would be sacked if we deviated from accepted practices to such a degree.

All I really know about rugby is from my university days....the members of the rugby team at my uni, and those from visiting teams who out-stayed their welcome on Wednesdays, were complete and utter tossers.

I have heard the term girls used as a reference for adult teams before, especially in posh sports. And all the comments about education and schools were past tense: educated and “from Longhill”. I’m from Tideway....and I’m an adult. I took this to mean something different to what you did. I...

And still we have no idea of the age of this team which you stated were comprised off “under age schoolgirls”. Maybe it’s you that hasn’t grasped the situation? Or were too hasty in picking a fight you jumped to conclusions?

I don’t know Gwylan and I have no idea whether he has a daughter, if his daughter indeed plays for that team or have no idea how old his daughter is.

I think you need to re-read the post. It didn’t mention anything about their age. “have a girls team that's dominated by private school educated girls: we have no girls at all from BACA, Longhill or Varndean.” Girls team, they’re privately educated. None come from state schools. This does not...

Schoolgirls? No I didn’t.

.......er.....what?

I’m off to the rugby club. Laters.

FFS are you deliberately being thick? You raised the issue of quantifying poverty, not me. I used the 50% as an example to challenge your assertion. Well done for quoting the dictionary definition....but how does this tie in with the 5% you stated?

This makes no sense. What if 50% of the population cannot afford to feed, clothe or house themselves? Would you only say the lower 10% of this group were in poverty? No, you wouldn’t.

As defined by the IFS, a politically independent body which analyses and assesses fiscal impact. They’re an open body so their definition should be easy to find. Read it, then comment.

As a working class socialist I’ve never been to a rugby match. :lolol:

I must admit, I don’t quite understand why were deemed nerds. Maybe wrong choice of noun?

I’m sure you did expect more...maybe The Clamp can pad it out with some simple but superfluous words so it’s in a “language” you can understand? :lolol:

And you have BigGully the waffling verbose saloon-bar-bore with a limited vocabulary and a surreal grasp of mathematics :lolol: Can you run that £230,000 house is as affordable as it was 15 years ago theory past me once again....I need a smile.

Like last time, I’m sure he’ll just disappear now.

Given the absolute nonsense (and this is being polite) you post, see the Brexit thread (see posts from 37711 to 37721) for example (and when this particular rubbish was picked apart and it was correctly predicted you would “disappear for the day”) I’m surprised anyone listens to you. If you do...

Nice timing....deflects away from “The number of children living in poverty will soar to a record 5.2 million over the next five years as the government’s welfare cuts bite deepest on households with young families, one of Britain’s leading thinktanks has warned. Research from the Institute...

To be fair, the Tories are doing Ernest’s job for him; if they’re not incompetent then they’re dirty perverts.