" since WW2.
Has the UK and Europe not been giving billions in aid to those " worse off than themselves". Having mass immigration over the years to many.
I asked "Why is it ONLY Europe's job to house and keep these people...??when Europe has NOTHING in common with them and most have mindsets...
Happy to go around this again. Yes, 50k could be a different number, there is no correct number. My call is somehwat less than the number when we helped Jews feeing Germany before the outbreak of WWII, which was 70k. Of course as a percentage of the populatioh it would be far smaller now. We...
I never said unfettered passage so not sure why you keep saying this.
Your second point on what is the tipping point is contradictory to the unfettered passage point.
Said many times, i think the UK should take 50k. What other countries take is up to them
:lolol: you trying to catch me out? I have said a few times before what i have just outlined, i dont think i have been contradictory. I have never said fill your boots but i am far more liberal than you. immigration is good for a country, it is what has made this country and most others. I have...
There is no reason why there are more people than wll funded and resourced camps. But these should not become permanent or ghettos. we still need a proper assulym process and we need a regionsl solution. The UK are doing some of this as you day but not enough are, and we are not really pulling...
I am pro immigration, especially for refugees. It does need to be more measured though. We should fund safe and welcoming centres in countries neighbouring problem areas and then go through our normal process to accept a level that is appropriate. We seem to be all over the place, neither one...
I suspect your solution (probably pull up the drawbrudge, exit Europe) would be different from mine (more active engagement in EU to change its direction).