Search results

Yep. I agree with you. Tourism as nothing to do with the Royals.

No worries, a million should do fine.

In that case, elect me and I promise to be apolitical and just cut ribbons.

You're right, it wasn't triple, and it's a close fight that London has won more often than Paris - from the look at one site. https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/london-paris-visitors-tourism-brexit-global-cities-index-a9091791.html What is interesting is that most visitors to...

I think you've answered your own question.

Fair enough. I didn't know anything about visitor stats and couldn't be bothered to type into google to find out. Well we don't want bloody foreigners here anyway, so let's keep the royals then. :-)

Surely, without the royals the whole changing of the guard malarky wouldn't have happened in the first place? Even if we turned Buck House into a museum - which it is for 3 months a year - then that's not going to boost tourism. Where are all these stats about Paris coming from? Also, Paris...

I don't believe in the whole idea behind hereditary entitlement, so it's a no from me. But a reluctant one. I really can't stand the thought of politicising the head of state. I actually like the fact that our Queen says nothing. In fact, when you think about it, what we do to that family is...