Search results

Thanks. The BBC website has now amended it using the 24 hour clock to clarify matters, although it can still be read that he received the email at the time i.e. actively opened at that time, rather than it being sent at 21.03. We may never know!

Interestingly, Poyet is quoted on the BBC website: "I got an e-mail that I suppose is information at 9:03 and another one from my solicitors; they are now taking care of everything, so I still haven't had a chance to read everything. I can't go into details of the future. It's just a matter of...

I certainly agree with you that if the club has evidence that contradicts what Gus says it would serve them to use it, even if it is to him during the appeal. But I respect the fact that they have created a path of action and are not being deflected from this by a sacked manager's allegations.

But that is a meaning you are choosing to create ('no statement means Gus was right'), rather than any concrete evidence. The club has already said they won't make further statements until the window of appeal expires.