Search results

Spellchecker not working?

What, you mean like 'X was sacked for something, and because there were stories that N were interested in him, he will be going up there to join up with Y (who isn't officially there yet) and Z'? Shock horror that would be, eh ......................?

Agree, but it still seems a strange one to have ruffled mod feathers - Ashworth to Newcastle for instance, although pretty much common knowledge now it's been reported so widely, still hasn't been officially announced yet (AFAIK) but was on NSC from day one. Yes, the resignation was announced...

Would we though, really? When it came to the crunch ......................

True - and I don't know what was posted in the plethora of deleted threads because we can't see them - but even at this level there is a big difference between posting, 'X has been sacked becaus he's done this' and posting 'The Mail and The Times have published articles that alledge that X has...

OK, fair enough if that's what you've been told. It's a shame that the same explanation wasn't more widely circulated. Happy to comply - certainly don't want to cause Bozza any trouble of that sort. No more from me on the subject - though it's hardly a private matter any more having been...

I'm fine, thanks. Somebody on NSC certainly isn't - but nobody knows why!.

Something has been reported in numerous press sources - not random whatsup, snapchat or Twatter entries. Despite these being firmly in the public domain, somebody on NSC is determined to censor any mention of certain articles in the Daily Fail, The Times, MSN etc. If there's a good reason for...