Search results

You could be right, but players want to break contracts all the time (by going somewhere else). But clubs don't fight it most of the time - it's not worth it. Time will tell on whether this was worth it.

Other managers, our players and potential players, fans, the LMA, the media etc. I think people in legal processes have a choice about what they do and this legal battle looks foolhardy to me.

Best not to guess I think. You're assuming that I believe we should abandon due process, I'm not. But there is always a choice about whether to go through a legal process and I'm questioning whether it's actually worth it in this case.

Anything you want? Suggest that the club is handling anything badly and at the moment and you're shot down by people that have 'faith in the club'. I have faith too, but that doesn't mean I can't be questioning about the way they handle things and this whole mess looks like a shambles to me.

Tano's suspension is lifted, this does not confirm he is coming back. It confirms that the club have reminded him what he is contractually obliged to do. ie. return. It's pretty obvious that if Poyet goes, so will Tano.

Nice one. Anyway - you think this looks good do you? You think that this legal posturing reflects well on us (regardless of whether we are right)? You think everything is rosy for next season whilst we conclude this nonsense one (pointless) step at a time? Heaven help us. How have we gone...

Hmmm, we'll see. I'm pretty confident though that the media won't paint this as a triumph for due process.

I have some degree of confidence in that too. Which is unrelated to my view about how it looks and how it might turn out given its handling.

How absolutely FARCICAL. This is bizarre and the media will report it as such. It all helps make us look a bit of a joke.