Search results

No excuse for sudden immature outbursts on an internet forum, I guess you lack the imagination to recognise that your post too cause much unwarranted stimuli ......nah you probably dont.

Brave chap....do me a favour ....... I will re-iterate that Wilkins was never more than a few days at a time away from the training ground, he might when he had a viral infection spent a few days away from the training ground but not 3 consecutive weeks as implied. Where the hell do you think...

It was your initial claim which was responded to by me. I gotta say I always thought you slightly odd, but felt that it was fair to have some passionate debates with you, however even I couldnt join in the vitriol thats come your way and by people that claim to know you, although I always...

Your talking to the wrong people. Try talking to the Gary Harts etc. that feed the press, this forum and random fans with replica shirts at any function that they feel might add an extra pound coin to the kitty at their up and coming testimonial.

The last point was: Vulture said that 'whatever the truth' etc...etc... thats odd because the truth is critical to his view on Wilkins. You seem to hold a view and wont let a good bit of truth get in the way of that view. You posted that Wilkins was absent alot earlier in the discussion, I...

Your an agrressive one aint ya .......... Couldnt quite debate the last point eh !! Go and contact your newest mates, coz you have the players numbers havent you ..... and tell them that they were lying .... go on .... dare ya.

Its not really a fairpoint at all. your 'whatever the truth' is critical to your latter assumption of the players discontent with Wilkins. It would only suggest 'pretty serious discontent' if: a) Last years first team players that were not subsequantly released by Wilkins were the ones...

I have just told you , that it is someone within the training ground. Find it out there would be bucket loads of people that could confirm whether Wilkins was absent for the times stated.

Your a precious little devil aint ya. How can I say unequivocally that Wilkins was not absent as you and your mates made out, without frigging knowing that he was there !!! Well work it out !! the nature of my source is someone that obviously was also at the training ground whilst Wilkins was...

Your kiddin me, you will not say which players offered you the inaccuracies whilst demanding to know how I am aware that they were telling you 'their newest best friend' a pack of lies. However this is one over time can be substantiated without me having to publicly divulge my source. I say...

I have absolutely nothing against Hart, but thought his digs at Wilkins were unfair. But surprisingly as he posts on here, he IS likely to read mine, yours and Mr Burns poxy posts !!

It is interesting that the discussion included this and as you say the player's point was unambiguous. Because quite frankly he is not telling you the truth, therefore it seems that maybe that player has an agenda himself. Again I can tell you that Wilkins was not away from the club for a 3...

As for the slur bit, that would depend which players might of offered this inaccuarte information. Or you yourself have taken a comment from a player out of context and used it to wrongly insinuate a reason why Wilkins needed to be replaced. Either way it remains the case that Wilkins was...

What professional footballers 'untrustworthy liars' jeeeez never !!!! They maybe untrustworthy liars or maybe a throw away comment by them was then used by you to post an untruth to in some way slur Wilkins. Thats for you to decide or explain. But I re-iterate that Wilkins was never absent...

Wilkins was not away from the training ground for anyway near 3 weeks. He had a virus and was under orders from the club doctor that he should keep away from the playing staff for a while. It amounted to a few days here and there, even travelling to a game or two with the club doctor rather...

TLO .... dont be so petulant ..... ffs You said that he was away from the club for 3 weeks. That is just NOT true, now you will have to pull your mates that gave you that information if you want, but if you post something that is totally wrong, what do you expect me to say.

There was a time when he had flu. But the 3 weeks period is a gross exaggeration. I think if you added up all the sick days or indeed days off he had during his tenure it wouldnt add up to 21 days.

There was not a consecutive 3 weeks period when he was not there.

Why is there such mystery surrounding Harts brochure. I havent got a clue what your on about, however why can't anyone put what the problem was. I dare say that it is something quite trivial, with maybe somehow a view of blaming Wilkins.