Just reading the reports of the final day of evidence. Paula Vennells really doesn't get it does she ? She should be stripped of her pension, made bankrupt and sent to prison. Disgusting human being.
Got to disagree on this. Techies will always confirm if something can or can not be achieved technically not if it's business viable. As an example, I've run network teams and I could ask them to ensure BGP is running across the internet side of the business and OSPF on the internal networks...
Call me a cynic but that seems it might have been on purpose .... after all, who's going to pay the ICO fine ? Ah, of course, the taxpayer not the execs. Revenge from the execs.
FFS - just ONCE, just ONCE, can you not derail a thread with your petty political sniping ? If you're so desperate to call people out over their voting habits then stick to one if the political threads. Pretty sure the mods have pointed this out to you before. Just stick to the PO scandal in...
While I'd suggest two wrongs don't make a right, it seems reasonable to hold people to account. Even more so when respected members of communities have had their names dragged through the mud, lost everything, been to prison, been made bankrupt and even killed themselves based on a bunch of lies...
I think the OP was referring to the QC Mr Beer's reminder at the start of a question - it suggests in answering the question he next asked she could incriminate herself. Doesn't matter any way as Beer made her look a right lying plum and it's one day one of three with her on the stand - bring on...
It's very obvious which end of the call the recording was made from. I wonder if Second Sight thought, or knew, she was going to try and throw them under the bus ? Or am I being too cynical ?
That was Jamail Singh - the Post Office LAWYER on the stand today. I'm not sure how stupid he thinks the rest of us are but the idea that a highly paid professional lawyer doesn't know how to save an MS Office file is farcical. The bloke is a grade A corrupt, lying cvnt.
Not sure it's the public that is the issue - it's the PO execs and lawyers denying that there was ever access .... or at least that they never 'knew' about it. Equally, it should have been PCI-DSS compliant - unaudited backdoor access to the data is not allowed in a PCI environment.
Another IT lifer - and let's remember applications and data generally are kept separate with only the application having access to add, change or delete data and then only with detailed audit trails.
Supposedly some of the most intelligent and well paid professions yet every single one a liar with a poor memory. Think this shot of one of the PO's lawyers from today somewhat show's he knows he's been caught lying.
As an aside, if I ever need a lawyer I want Jason Beer - great name and even...
Isn't that the same for all of them ? Every single one of the witnesses linked to the PO has started (and I paraphrase) 'I'm so sorry for the people that have been convicted unjustly.". Not a single one has held their hands up and said "Yes, I PERSONALLY got it wrong and should PERSONALLY be...