I certainly would. a) We never win at Wembley and b) while we are very even with Palace down the years, they always win the ones that matter.
So it's a "no thanks" from me.
Sadly because everybody is so ruddy excited - even moreso than the last 2 cup runs to the semis where the feeling was always that Man City would win it in the end - we are doomed to a shit performance tomorrow and a comfortable home loss. Think Southampton in 1986.
Yes, Dean is not unlikeable. But that's now 4 boardroom appearances in a row. It was clear the first two times Sugar was never going to sack him, but now alarm bells are ringing. He needs a good performance in case he ends up on the losing side next week and isn't on the same team as Liam.
Yep.
Looking at the competition, Dean is a spiv who is prepared to take a chance but doesn't instill any confidence. Chisola is enthusiastic but offers little else, Amber-Rose is bland, Jordan is a gobshite with a comically inflated opinion of himself. He is literate and can sell, but is...
Sralun will definitely bin him THE SECOND he gets the chance. Liam is an absolute simpleton.
He was bailed out by dreamy, competent Mia and they won despite him, not because of him. He is a thick dork
I still watch Jiri Skalak's absolute biffing thrike from the 4-0 home win against QPR. It doesn't mean I'd want him anywhere near our Premier League squad.
There are issues in Enciso's game that mean he's playing for a side doomed to relegation, and not one threatening the Champions League...
I wonder when we'll get the usual unsettling rumours from his agent? That's what normally happens for a couple of weeks after one of his screamers isn't it?
It wouldn't surprise me if they don't plan to even do that, beyond the games where trouble is more likely and the police put their foot down on such a policy.
We've already had Norwich (and I dare say a few other clubs) fans drinking in the north stand concourse post match. It would be...
You do your argument no good with this sort of overstatement. HT is doing no such thing - he's pointing out that a season ticket offers a discount in return for commitment. There's quite clearly no lecture there whatsoever.
My opinion is this: the problem is that the club is at its most...
To be honest, you remind me of that meme of a stick-man shouting from his computer to his wife in bed that he couldn't come to bed because someone is wrong on the internet. We'll go round and round on this all day so best agree to disagree.
The bottom line for me is that Trump is a revolting...
So what? One of them opportunistically sided with one side and one opportunistically sided with the other. :shrug: Neither decision was made with the help of any sort of moral compass, and we know this because of both of their track records.
I'm not sure how this supports your point that Johnson wouldn't do what he liked at the expense of democracy. At the time, Feb 22, there was no reason for Johnson not to support Ukraine was there? Bear in mind that Trump is turning his back on them after the US has spent billions of tax...
I seem to remember Johnson threatening to prorogue parliament when it threatened to legislate against a no-deal Brexit and only didn't do so when prevented by the courts.
Johnson was more than happy to ride roughshod over democracy when it suited him.