Without charge? I never mentioned about charging them, but of course there would be a charge - it would effectively be a nationalised administration.
Sorry, I should have been clearer, I meant the miners. Not Labour MPs.
I'm shocking when it comes to Prime Ministers names prior to Thatcher. I think it's clear there wasn't any plans, also - would if have been possibly to plan? These men were manual labourers and the economy during Thatchers' time moved towards services, huge disparity in skill required. I suppose...
Ah, I remember the days of A level politics and being told of the evils the Tories did during the 80s. Conveniently, we only found out about the Winter of Discontent because the text book we were using used it to illustrate Labour's failures - tutor of course told us to skip that section.
I...
I would want to know what Carillion said the government after their first few profit warnings, because the government would surely have needed reassurances on their financial state. I would also want to know if the government had an insurance on the projects, like a business disruption...
Are you on a personal mission to increase your post count by simply starting threads?
But on topic, I didn't realise there was rumours linking us to him.
Only rumours we've been rejected :facepalm:
Poor management, Carillion wouldn't have cash to pay for its projects so would borrow to pay for those projects. The chances are, market conditions went against them, it all sounds a bit like Monarch and management not adapting to the changing landscape.
:facepalm: another missing the point and fallacious arguing otherwise.
Your inference is that we didn't get him because of our pay structure.....jesus wept.
That's not the point. OP was stating we didn't invest, whether they were played or not is not the point.