Unless its improved dramatically, not sure where you are coming from??
I stopped buying it last season, couldnt understand what point was being made most of the time....
I dont disagree with that about first game never thought you were ever in control at Amex though. Harding was rugby tackling Buckley, clearest chance of first half fell to Cook, and I'm usually a pessimist but was half expected what happened in second half. It reminded me of what happened at...
I dont hate Harding but looking down that line, he threw himself across Buckley and rugby tackled him at one point in the first half, he got away because ref and linesman werent in line, nothing was given. Throughout half his tactic was to baulk Buckley by coming across him and he did it time...
It is hard to measure different generations, ball was a lot heavier for a start. Altho I think Greaves was considered best goalscorer in europe if not the world in the early to mid 60s dont think VN was ever both. As for Best, he was a winger back then. But with the kind of ability to be...
I think there was clearly something, the problem is that the strength of our team was built around him and Bennett and they are proving difficult to replace, as is kishishev. We are struggling a bit at the moment. Nothing though that a tall striker/link player and anchor man would not rectify.
Yours is the closest to my assessment, but football really is about team (e.g. Napoli's success over Man C) not individuals, so I hate this type of football manageresque summary of performance. I also hate the announcement of MoM 10 mins before end of game, now that really grates..
However...
Yes its a ridiculous rule in that it also works against young players getting experience of being involved in a match and thereby giving them proper incentives. It also would give us a picture if a player is injured or not as listening to Gus is pointless. I think my rule of thumb is Buckley...
I hope not...
The abuse Chris Wood got, and he was 19 and scored goals in an all conquering team. This year looking how weak physically our forward line is and comparing that with him a year older, physically imposing and banging goals in at championship level...
Sums it up really...
Nonsense -Bendtner's meant to be a giant whose far too soft. Barnes is about as opposite of him as you can get, early last seson whenever he missed he kept going in there. Sorry but Gus' view and 20 league one goals means that all those who have gone on about him are wrong; pity they cant take...
What a load of nonsense..
Firstly I think we will see a multitude of tackles worse than Dunk's on a weekly basis. Key was Tv proves, and Ive just checked again, it wasnt from behind or from head on. Naylor's could have been a horror one if Barnes hadnt sen him coming. But even that is nothing...
Football is not championship manager, its about squads and variety, which is impacted on by the type of opposition. Didnt think it was easy playing up front for us yesterday because we struggled in central midfield. At times we did need someone playing down middle to flick the ball on. Doncaster...
Nonsense it was a booking no more. There was one appalling tackle in game and it came on Barnes from naylor and if he hadnt seen it coming that would have been a Sharp like injury and a sending off.
I liked roberts, Beeney was a big, solid goalkeeper. When it came to making saves - Grummitt and Kuipers (particularly in the early days) were excellent shot stoppers.
I was never a keeley fan, he was not big enough and beaten too often by balls that were not in the corner. The fact he did not...
No it doesnt cause offence, otherwise why do black people forever call each other ******, it only causes offence if a white person were ever to use that term.