Cheers for the explanation. I'm still baffled by the other fellas reply about sky though.and I'm still a but under whelmed by the whole reason they don't Blame Murdoch is because he apparently gave a bollocking. Was anyone sacked over it?.seems Flimsy to me but they clearly have other reasons...
fair enough but that wasnt implied by the reply to the earlier point.he implied that he didnt mind subscribing to sky as it was the only tv station showing the games regardless of it being news international or not.shouldnt their anger and hatred be aimed at mackenzie now rather than the sun...
So it's ok to fund the Murdoch empire if it suits? Say for example the sun got exclusive rights to covering Football unlikely i know but would it then be ok to buy it? because no one else has coverage?