Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...







Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,833
West west west Sussex
Most people in Britain thought that too
Why you - why now 🤦🏻‍♂️
If only Liz had hung on for a couple of more days she wouldn't have ruined The Truss' leadership.
 


Pevenseagull

Anti-greed coalition
Jul 20, 2003
19,655


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
17,909
Deepest, darkest Sussex
If only Liz had hung on for a couple of more days she wouldn't have ruined The Truss' leadership.
When you think about it, it’s was incredibly selfish of the late Queen really to die then
 


Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,833
West west west Sussex
When you think about it, it’s was incredibly selfish of the late Queen really to die then
Much like it was rather selfish of The Trussaton to take all my money.
 




lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969
Jun 11, 2011
13,728
Worthing
Guidance to Police from the CPS in regard to the Representation of the People Act 1983.

Practically, it is always worthwhile when advising the police, particularly when they have received a complaint from a political opponent, to suggest that they get the complainant to identify which of the provisions of the RPA they claim have been breached.

Section 176 lays down the time-limit for the commencement of proceedings for any offence under any provision contained in or made under RPA 1983. That applies to summary only offences which would normally, by virtue of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, be subject to a 6-month time limit.

Proceedings against a person in respect of any offence to which Section 176 applies must be commenced within one year after the offence was committed. For the purpose of Section 176, the laying of information is deemed to be the commencement of the proceedings. There are circumstances in which the time limit can be extended but an application to a Magistrates’ Court do so must be made within the 12-month time limit.



Why are the Police investigating something that appears to have a 12 month time limit?
 


clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,347
Guidance to Police from the CPS in regard to the Representation of the People Act 1983.

Practically, it is always worthwhile when advising the police, particularly when they have received a complaint from a political opponent, to suggest that they get the complainant to identify which of the provisions of the RPA they claim have been breached.

Section 176 lays down the time-limit for the commencement of proceedings for any offence under any provision contained in or made under RPA 1983. That applies to summary only offences which would normally, by virtue of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, be subject to a 6-month time limit.

Proceedings against a person in respect of any offence to which Section 176 applies must be commenced within one year after the offence was committed. For the purpose of Section 176, the laying of information is deemed to be the commencement of the proceedings. There are circumstances in which the time limit can be extended but an application to a Magistrates’ Court do so must be made within the 12-month time limit.



Why are the Police investigating something that appears to have a 12 month time limit?
Because they have become so politicised they are damned if they do damned if they don't.

I don't extend that to the MET which should be disbanded.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
11,884
Cumbria
Guidance to Police from the CPS in regard to the Representation of the People Act 1983.

Practically, it is always worthwhile when advising the police, particularly when they have received a complaint from a political opponent, to suggest that they get the complainant to identify which of the provisions of the RPA they claim have been breached.

Section 176 lays down the time-limit for the commencement of proceedings for any offence under any provision contained in or made under RPA 1983. That applies to summary only offences which would normally, by virtue of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, be subject to a 6-month time limit.

Proceedings against a person in respect of any offence to which Section 176 applies must be commenced within one year after the offence was committed. For the purpose of Section 176, the laying of information is deemed to be the commencement of the proceedings. There are circumstances in which the time limit can be extended but an application to a Magistrates’ Court do so must be made within the 12-month time limit.



Why are the Police investigating something that appears to have a 12 month time limit?
They don't have to 'commence proceedings'. They could say 'appears to have broken electoral law, but time limit has expired, so we won't prosecute'.

They are just doing the job for their political paymasters - not for the public good.
 






lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969
Jun 11, 2011
13,728
Worthing
…..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6720.jpeg
    IMG_6720.jpeg
    500.6 KB · Views: 53


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Guidance to Police from the CPS in regard to the Representation of the People Act 1983.

Practically, it is always worthwhile when advising the police, particularly when they have received a complaint from a political opponent, to suggest that they get the complainant to identify which of the provisions of the RPA they claim have been breached.

Section 176 lays down the time-limit for the commencement of proceedings for any offence under any provision contained in or made under RPA 1983. That applies to summary only offences which would normally, by virtue of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, be subject to a 6-month time limit.

Proceedings against a person in respect of any offence to which Section 176 applies must be commenced within one year after the offence was committed. For the purpose of Section 176, the laying of information is deemed to be the commencement of the proceedings. There are circumstances in which the time limit can be extended but an application to a Magistrates’ Court do so must be made within the 12-month time limit.



Why are the Police investigating something that appears to have a 12 month time limit?
To try and implicate Andy Burnham, who is PCC in Manchester?
 














Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
50,298
Faversham


Came across this clip on you tube.

Why did this country let Maggie do all this?

We elected her three times 🙈

She had the nation mesmerized. Just like Johnson had the nation mesmerized, and Trump has a big swathe of the US mesmerized. Once you get mesmerized, all rational thought ceases, and all you see is what you want to see.

I had no trouble loathing Thatcher at the time. However, although I never voted for him, I found myself chuckling at the comedy chat from Johnson, and had to actively resist his charm. Obviously Trump repulses me. I still really like 'war criminal' Blair. And despite having rejoined Labour, I struggle to warm to Starmer.

Humans are a funny old lot of rum coves as you well know.
Have a lovely day today - Spring is here! :thumbsup:

Edit: just listened to the clip. Made me feel sad and angry. We certainly did need to modernize, and having the likes of Scargill 'holding the nation to ransom' was not good.....but the elimination of empathy and compassion in the process of the 'great leap forward' of privatization was the thing that was most unacceptable. Rather like overseeing a childbirth with trowel and fork. I wonder what the future will bring.
 
Last edited:








TomandJerry

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2013
11,539
Hundreds of thousands fewer disabled people could receive cold weather payments under the Conservatives’ planned post-election disability benefit reforms, according to an internal government report seen by the Observer.

The briefing, by civil servants at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), says that under the plans, new applicants for disability benefits in England and Wales would only qualify for cold weather payments if they passed a much harsher assessment than exists at present.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: A1X


Pevenseagull

Anti-greed coalition
Jul 20, 2003
19,655
Tim Loughton, Easy Worthing and Shoreham, has given up.

Not one of his constituents so I don't know if he was a 'good' MP at that level.

I am aware of some rather grubby expenses.

However, my impression was that he was less of an utter scumbag than the average Tory of late.


Anyway, off you trot.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here