Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] The new England shirt



Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
50,200
Faversham
I’m not being triggered but them idiots. I am allowed to have an opinion that isn’t my usual
Left if centre type.
You are absolutely correct and I apologize for being condescending.
 




StonehamPark

#Brighton-Nil
Oct 30, 2010
9,780
BC, Canada
I think if the reasoning for the colour change/'update' was much clearer, there'd be far less outrage and division.

For example, I think something like this would have cleared everything up and most(?) people would have been content, imo:

1711132060023.png
 


vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,897
What a load of over reaction clap trap. Sub-headline.. " Innovative Marketing ploy brings faded, overpriced Garment back in to Public Consciousness "
 




mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,503
England
I must be one of the easily triggered morons you speak of, but at least I served 31 years in HM Forces protecting British peoples‘ right to spout whatever utter cack they choose to.

The previous shirt had a miniature England flag on the back of the neck, this has been removed, presumably by some woke wally at the FA and replaced with some meaningless rectangle that most patriotic English people aren’t in favour of. These people include the Prime Minister and the Leader of The Opposition and numerous other distinguished and eloquent individuals from all elements of the political and social spectrum.

What’s genuinely depressing is the ability of so many people to succeed in starting a fight, on their own in a phone box. ☹️
Were you offended the other times we've had crosses on the kit that weren't the right colours?

Or the times we had no crosses at all?
 




Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
23,849
GOSBTS
Hilarious seeing the reaction to this. Nike must be pissing themselves at the publicity it’s got.

Given previous examples of shirts with ‘playful’ crosses why are all the gammons angry now?
 




Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
14,860
You know, I can laugh at this now, because you are entirely incorrect 😂😂😂

I was just not in the right mind neither could I be arsed to properly reply.

You self righteous turd slide. 😏
Er, OK then?

:shrug:
 




Wozza

Shite Supporter
Jul 6, 2003
23,634
Online
But the FA have to sign it off 🤷‍♂️
Sure. But you said Nike are "merely the manufacturer".

They're not. They're the manufacturers, the designers and, perhaps more pertinently, the marketeers who published these words, which has caused all the nonsense. (And it is nonsense)

“On the back of the collar, you'll find a playful interpretation of the flag of St George in red and blue. It's a fun flavour to inspire and unite players and fans alike around the game.”
 




Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
21,631
Brighton
Hilarious seeing the reaction to this. Nike must be pissing themselves at the publicity it’s got.

Given previous examples of shirts with ‘playful’ crosses why are all the gammons angry now?
Indeed.

The real story on this shirt was the horrific, unjustifiable and astonishing price of the garment.

Nike have managed to stoke up so much gammon-anger that many have forgotten this original headline news. It’s almost like they planned it by tricking the thickest c***s in the Country to force the media dial away from their vile profiteering.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,599
The more I keep reading about this everywhere the more I'm realising how pathetic it really is. I don't think they should have done it, but in the grand scheme of life it really, really doesn't matter.
 


BN41Albion

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2017
6,421
Thread over. I don't remember anyone having a problem with the change of colours and stylistic representation of the Union flag.

Complete non-story for a collar decoration on the rear of a football shirt.

The England badge is 3 lions, everything else on the national shirt is decoration. There was no St George's cross on the shirts in 1966, or most shirts since. Another excuse to ignite a culture war.

We live in different times now, sadly, where social media Twatter (sorry, X) culture dictates levels of outrage by morons
 








BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,127
To me this is the classic minor issue that gets magnified by social media and the perma-offended snowflakes.

Rates as about a 2 out of 10 on my give a f*** o'metre, if pushed for an opinion I would say I prefer my George's cross red. Social media demands we have an opinion on everything so this somewhat clumsy attempt at inclusivity is now a massive discussion.

I have a suggestion to lighten the red on the St George's cross to reflect the angry glow of those triggered by changes to it . . . except if they cover it in their nationalistic nonsense
 








mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,503
England
Hilarious seeing the reaction to this. Nike must be pissing themselves at the publicity it’s got.

Given previous examples of shirts with ‘playful’ crosses why are all the gammons angry now?
We all know why

Because they've glanced at it, seen different colours and incorrectly interpreted it as a nod to the rainbow flag (despite it only having maybe 3 colours that match), used it as a chance to use the word "woke" again despite having no idea what it means..and then instead of admitting it isn't actually what they thought, they've then instead doubled down by claiming the flag should never be tampered with, despite it having been done several times over, probably on shirts they wore themselves.
That wasn't the competing kit.
1711183733240.png

1711183795507.png
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here