www.zerohedge.com
That's right, 60 pages! Doesn't even matter if it's less than 100 pages. There are loads of classified boxes there which makes the 60 pages harder to find. It's a smart bit of hiding from a guy smarter than all the other smart people.
It really is a waste of time trying to debate with these people, they’re gone, they have the football scarf on and they’re not taking it off.
Yeah but you are looking at all the evidence and taking a balanced view.
I wonder why he hadn't given the ones they found in his office, including in his desk drawer, back?
Your subject, the superfluous 'in', and a bit of your spelling are almost correct.
The Crawly drongo is doing a bad job of defending Trump. However, there is something compelling about @lasvegan's (presumed) narrative that when you wash off the greasepaint, there is very little of substance between Biden and the orange bungle****. If you can tolerate some buffoonery, some lies, some hubris, and just focus on your income, then why not vote Trump?
Good Man. You forgot hypocrites though - I detest them as well.
No one is accusing Trump of being a spy - in that sense, the Espionage Act would seem the wrong Act to apply but multiple people have been found guilty of retaining national security information under the Act with no intention of harming the US with it.
It has some merit, but then you remember Trump claims he won the last election and incited an insurrection. The MAGA lot are basically a crazed cult, but anyone who says 'They're all the same' while voting for him is part of the problem too.
Weren't they all Antifa? That was the first story, the rioters were all Antifa and other pinko liberals under 'false flags' trying to give honest-to-goodness Trump supporters a bad name - as if Trumpers would ever do something as unAmerican as attempt to overturn an election result. However all the prosecutions were of Trump supporters, which either means all the Anitifa were incredibly intelligent and managed to get Trump patsys arrested for their crimes - or there weren't any and Trump supporters really DID want to overturn the result.
If only Trump had got Delboy and Rodney in to clean his chandeliers, coincidentally while he was having a crap.
Yes. I suppose I was trying to express how it is possible that ostensibly sensible people in the US can vote for Trump.
No one is accusing Trump of being a spy - in that sense, the Espionage Act would seem the wrong Act to apply but multiple people have been found guilty of retaining national security information under the Act with no intention of harming the US with it.
The Espionage Act relates to specifically to material of national security value and dosen’t require such papers to be declassified or classified - nor does it require the prosecutors to prove any knowledge on Trump’s part that papers relating to national security could do harm to the US if not properly secure, only that a reasonable person would think so. One does not have to show intention to use such information against the US either. Simply not handling them in a secure way or withholding them over time from the FBI and defence community who repeatedly asked them back, can be a breach of the Act and this is exactly what he has been charged with:
18 U.S.C. §§ 793, (d) makes it a crime to remove, copy or share national defense information, or to “willfully [retain]” national defense information and “[fail] to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it”—
As I said in my post above about this:
It doesn’t matter whether Trump thinks he declassified the documents or not or whether he realised their importance, just that he had ample opportunity to return papers relating to national security matters when asked and refused to do so …
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
www.law.cornell.edu
www.voanews.com
