Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Right then. After that demonstration... VAR? Yes or No?

VAR


  • Total voters
    444


Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
57,940
hassocks
Liverpool’s winner came from an incorrectly given throw in yesterday - which is my major issue with the system - an incorrectly given corner/throw is more of an issue than a shoe lace being offside as it actually changes the game.

As for Robertsons challenge not being looked at because he wasn’t booked?

So many flaws
 




Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,741
Eastbourne
Did anyone else notice for Burnley's disallowed goal it looked like they drew the lines in the wrong place?

Abraham's leg was sticking out but they still drew the line from his body. No discussion on MOTD I guess because it didn't affect the result, but it seems like another case of the bigger gamma being favoured and nobody talks about it if it's a small club on the wrong end of the decision.

And yet it is consistently trotted out here, by var's proponents, that it will even the playing field.
 






Frutos

.
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
May 3, 2006
35,598
Northumberland
Have we actually won any game when VAR has served us an advantage? Spurs might have been the only one?
Everton at home?

I seem to remember the equalising penalty being given by VAR, with Digne then scoring an OG to give us the win.
 






Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,741
Eastbourne
As well as Everton, Arsenal had a goal disallowed by VAR in our 2-1 win.

The Everton decision would almost certainly not have been given without var's intervention, so therefore may be considered to have aided us. The Arsenal decision was miles offside and almost certainly have been flagged as such had var not been in operation. Therefore, to suggest var gave us an advantage in that case is specious to say the least.
 






Quinney

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2009
3,654
Hastings
A hat-trick of incorrect decisions tonight from V A R across 3 games. V A R needs a serious revamp before next season kick off. Not good enough to simply come out after the game and say it was an incorrect decision.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 








Dirty Dave

Well-known member
Aug 28, 2006
2,996
Worthing
What's happened to the ref reviewing decisions on the pitch side cameras? I thought they were being encouraged to do this....


Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
61,457
Chandlers Ford
A hat-trick of incorrect decisions tonight from V A R across 3 games. V A R needs a serious revamp before next season kick off. Not good enough to simply come out after the game and say it was an incorrect decision.

I quite agree Quinney. This system ought to be ditched as u fit for purpose. Unfortunately those in power seem determined to press on regardless

I am pro VAR but after last night something has to happen that was awful ( wonderful for us).

I didn’t see all the football last night. What were the contentious decisions? I saw the early one in the Bournemouth game, which was a clear penalty for the shove on Kane, so that’s one. Nothing else amiss on that game though.
Edit - I’ve seen this now:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53357841

I’ve not seen the Saints one so can’t comment, but I’m really surprised they’ve come out and admitted error on the Bruno one. That really seems like a referee’s (wrong but understandable) call to me, that enabled the VAR to bottle it and use the ‘clear and obvious’ defence.
 
Last edited:






hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
61,457
Chandlers Ford
I am pro VAR but after last night something has to happen that was awful ( wonderful for us).

I’d argue about the mistakes being ‘wonderful for us’.

One went ‘for’ us, and one ‘against’ us, and on balance it was an overall negative - Villa would almost certainly have lost with or without that penalty, yet Bournemouth ground out a point, they probably wouldn’t have got.
 


Quinney

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2009
3,654
Hastings
I didn’t see all the football last night. What kind where the contentious decision? I saw the early one in the Bournemouth game, which was a clear penalty for the shove on Kane, so that’s one. Nothing else amiss on that game though.

What did I miss?

Two very dubious penalties. I listened to the Man Utd one being giving on the radio so didn’t see it until MOTD, but the Southampton penalty just didn’t look right to start with and clearly wasn’t a penalty when replayed. How the V A R didn’t overturn both penalties I’ve no idea. As for the push on Kane, that was just ridiculous.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 


Worried Man Blues

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2009
6,650
Swansea
I’d argue about the mistakes being ‘wonderful for us’.

One went ‘for’ us, and one ‘against’ us, and on balance it was an overall negative - Villa would almost certainly have lost with or without that penalty, yet Bournemouth ground out a point, they probably wouldn’t have got.

I was only talking about the Villa one, took the stuffing out of them, ridiculous decision, if only VAR was held to account
 








keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,672
Based on last night there does appear to be a new offence for defenders of being kicked by an attacker
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here