Nothing else seems to stop the likes of Zaha and Townsend going to ground.
Would this work?
[tweet]1104407249206693888[/tweet]
Would this work?
[tweet]1104407249206693888[/tweet]
Nothing else seems to stop the likes of Zaha and Townsend going to ground.
Would this work?
[tweet]1104407249206693888[/tweet]
Nothing else seems to stop the likes of Zaha and Townsend going to ground.
Would this work?
[tweet]1104407249206693888[/tweet]
I think VAR will make this issue largely redundant.
Townsend starts his dive before there’s contact - but difficult for the ref to seeTownsend dives 100%. You just watch him scrape his foot along the floor. There is thigh to thigh contact so prob a pen but he cheated. First angle looked nailed on pen. Second angle looked clear dive. Ref nearly cost us after missing a much much much clearer pen on Duffy in first half. So that’s 2 wins with a man less this season![]()
Townsend dives 100%. You just watch him scrape his foot along the floor. There is thigh to thigh contact so prob a pen but he cheated. First angle looked nailed on pen. Second angle looked clear dive. Ref nearly cost us after missing a much much much clearer pen on Duffy in first half. So that’s 2 wins with a man less this season![]()
Townsend starts his dive before there’s contact - but difficult for the ref to see
I think VAR will make this issue largely redundant.
My gut feeling is that under VAR we'd have got a penalty for the assault on Duffy and the Palace one would have stood.
If you handle the ball (cheat) to stop a goal you get a red card. So if you dive and appeal (cheating) for a penalty, you should be awarded a penalty, but if the penalty is scored, the goal is chalked off and the player (cheat) red carded. Both players have cheated to stop or score a goal so both should be sent off.
Why have a penalty kick at all, why should there a different punishment just because the foul took place in the penalty area