[Football] Chelsea facing two year transfer ban

[portslade seagull]

That's more like it but can we do 40pts just to make sure otherwise it might be tight

 

[alfredmizen]

No, she was replying to a post that said 'transfer ban'. Her reply was 100% appropriate.

No it wasnt , she was responding to the optimist who mentioned that chelsea may refuse to sell ruben loftus cheek , her response was totally and utterly irrelevant.

 

[RandyWanger]

It'll never happen. FIFA are as spineless as they are corrupt.

 

[Whitechapel]

30 point deduction. Two more teams to do the same. Job done. Another season in the Premier League.

Chelsea could very easily lose 30 points and still finish above us

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

No it wasnt , she was responding to the optimist who mentioned that chelsea may refuse to sell ruben loftus cheek , her response was totally and utterly irrelevant.

Apologies - you're right. Chelsea can sell but not buy, as [MENTION=14365]Thunder Bolt[/MENTION] said, but the previous poster had not said that they can't sell or buy, so TB's reply was agreeing with the previous poster but sounding like she was correcting him.

Crikey, if you let loose on the rest of last week's NSC posts with the same forensic diligence we are all in for a tough old time! I, personally, will need a new tin hat.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

No it wasnt , she was responding to the optimist who mentioned that chelsea may refuse to sell ruben loftus cheek , her response was totally and utterly irrelevant.

Most posts on Nsc are totally & utterly irrelevant.

 

[dadams2k11]

Most posts on Nsc are totally & utterly irrelevant.

^^^^Like this one ^^^^

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

^^^^Like this one ^^^^

Like the one above you mean

 

[dadams2k11]

Like the one above you mean

No, the one above.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

No, the one above.

Oh yes, ha ha. To bantz.

 

[dadams2k11]

Oh yes, ha ha. To bantz.

[emoji106]