Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

England - press reporting 6 changes vs Slovakia







beefypigeon

Well-known member
Aug 14, 2008
960
I'd be surprised if Rooney were dropped, being skipper he should be there every game and he's been fantastic so far.

RE the rest, I wouldn't be too surprised if we rotate the strikers, and after the last couple of performances giving Alli and Sterling a rest also makes sense.

Not sure on rotating the full-backs, although I'm confident both Clyne and Bertrand are more than capable. Not sure they offer the same threat going forward as Walker and Rose do mind!
 


Stumpy Tim

Well-known member
Six changes is a lot, but there is definitely a case to be made for Sturridge & Vardy for Sterling & Kane anyway. My biggest concern is playing Wilshere & Henderson in midfield together given they've both been out for so long. Personally I wouldn't change the full-backs, and I wouldn't put Henderson in for Rooney. I can see the merits of Wilshere for Alli for this one game - Alli should take his place back in the next game though.

Alternatively, put Wilshere in midfield, and push Alli into Lallana's position.
 


SK1NT

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2003
8,732
Thames Ditton
This is frustrating as a few of my bets rely on England winning tonight.

We last played over 4 days ago. These super fit athletes recovery is so quick that 4 days is more than enough. They shouldn't need to be rested

1) should try and keep the winning run going and play the strongest team.
2) send out a message to other teams by looking good
3) More minutes for the team to play together and gel even more so
4) Top the group for the nice sat afternoon easier fixture.
 


Wilko

LUZZING chairs about
Sep 19, 2003
9,924
BN1
I do not like the big changes myself. Fine if we had 1st already tied up but seems like it has a high possibility of a **** up.
 








Gabbafella

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
4,736
As long as Milner doesn't play, I couldn't care less.
 




Peter Grummit

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2004
6,769
Lewes
If true, absolute madness.

Rooney bossed the game against Wales, he is the source of most of our creativity. Unless he has a knock, he must play.

I am (just about) old enough to remember Alf Ramsey taking off Bobby Charlton when we were 2 nil up to West Germany in the 70WCQF, to rest him for the semi. A decision that sparked the end for our WC defence and the start of the end for Ramsey.

PG
 












Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,234
Goldstone
If true, not exactly sure what Harry Kane's done wrong to fall out of favour with the manager so swiftly. Kane seems to me to be the future of the England attack for the foreseeable future. Offers far more scope as a striker than either Vardy or Sturridge. IMHO, like.
It's not that Kane's done a lot wrong, but isn't he knackered? If so, a rest must be a good idea.
 




Garry Nelson's Left Foot

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
13,158
tokyo
It's a gamble making so many changes but if it works out it'll be a really good move as it'll keep players fresh, everyone on their toes and will mean a minimum of 19 of the squad will have played in the tournament.

Individually there is a solid case for each of the changes, the gamble lies in whether so many changes will affect the fluency and cohesion of the team.

It's a ballsy move, I like it(unless we lose and other results contrive to get us knocked out in the group stage).
 




Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
70,431
It's not that Kane's done a lot wrong, but isn't he knackered? If so, a rest must be a good idea.

I guess that Kane COULD be being rested for the next round. But seeing as how he's been used for taking corners in this round, I'm a bit sceptical that the manager's not just making a bad call.
 


Albumen

Don't wait for me!
Jan 19, 2010
11,495
Brighton - In your face
Rooney was our best player in the first game, and our second best player in the second game. Wilshere must be AMAZING

Why does he have to be better? Slovakia are a different team, Wilshere plays differently to Rooney. Faster, more direct.

There'll be more teams to play as we're all but through already (even if in 3rd place). We've a 23 man squad, might as well use it.
 




pigbite

Active member
Sep 9, 2007
553
I don't think it's a bad thing to make the changes. I think Woy is taking a calculated risk that the team will still perform well enough to top the group and he gets a chance to give some players a little rest, perhaps reduce the injury risk, as well as see how others perform in what will be the least risky game of the tournament now. I suspect that he will keep the others on the bench in case of any slip ups. He picked a squad so why not use as many in the squad?
 


Stumpy Tim

Well-known member
Why does he have to be better? Slovakia are a different team, Wilshere plays differently to Rooney. Faster, more direct.

There'll be more teams to play as we're all but through already (even if in 3rd place). We've a 23 man squad, might as well use it.

Huh? You wrote, "Wilshere is better than Rooney in that position". Given Rooney has probably been our best player (with Walker), how can you say Wilshere is better?

But now you seem to be saying it doesn't matter. All very confusing!
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here