AFC Wimbledon given permission to build new stadium at Plough Lane

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Surf's Up

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2011
10,201
Here
I think Kingstonian actually own Kingsmeadow (?) so presumably there's an element of cashing in at the right time - particularly if they're selling to Chelsea(?). But I may be wrong on both fronts.
 








surrey jim

Not in Surrey
Aug 2, 2005
18,104
Bevendean
This would make a great holiwood film who would play who

Vinnie Jones could play Vinnie Jones, part of the crazy gang of footballers who played for Wimbledon in the 90's.

I think that sort of role would suit him
 


Driver8

On the road...
NSC Patron
Jul 31, 2005
16,006
North Wales
I think Kingstonian actually own Kingsmeadow (?) so presumably there's an element of cashing in at the right time - particularly if they're selling to Chelsea(?). But I may be wrong on both fronts.

According to those articles AFC Wimbledon owns kingsmeadow. That's how they are paying for the new ground (by selling to Chelsea).
 








Weatherman

New member
Jun 10, 2008
323
Why do Wimbledon need an 11,000 seater stadium for their 3000 supporters ?
This isn't a done deal yet. There are strong objections from Wandsworth council and local residents who would rather the greyhound stadium be there. The final decision could be Boris's.
Be a shame if the Last Greyhound stadium with a London postcode was to go.
 






Turkey

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
15,568
Good news that they have moved a step closer to a stadium and it looks pretty huge given the size of the club. The blocks of flats packed in around the stadium look proper grimbo- too many in a small space but I guess that's whet developers want to do these days- cram as many units on as possible.

It seems a bit of a disaster that Kingstonian are being kicked out of their own ground so that Chelsea can train there and play reserve and women's matches etc. Given what Wimbledon have been through this seems ridiculous but I'm sure there is more to it behind the scenes. Can anyone provide any insight- do Kingstonian just not need a ground that big, or can they not afford it?

It's not Kingstonian's ground, the guy who owned the ground sold it too AFC Wimbledon, who let Kingstonian play there rent free. Now they're selling the ground Wimbledon need the money to build their new ground.
 








Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,921
Brighton
Because the "Dons" part refers to Wimbledon, which if I understand correctly isn't actually part of Milton Keynes.

But the links to Wimbledon are part of the story of MK Dons. That doesn't change just because AFC Wimbledon have a new ground. You may not like it, but the link to wimbledon will always be a significant part of MK Dons lore.
 






sully

Dunscouting
Jul 7, 2003
7,850
Worthing
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-[emoji713 said:
-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;7186809]Why?

I wouldn't say they are as bad, but this is not in keeping with why they formed.

They are forcing other sports out of Wimbledon and leaving Kingstonian homeless. How would they like it if that happened to them? Oh!

Short memories, the lot of them.
 




Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,279
Surrey
Always said AFC Wimbledon fans were HYPOCRITES and now it's PROVED
This bit is total bollocks.

So Kingstonian suffer from this, the greyhound track goes and presumably Aldershot will lose revenue as well, as currently Chelsea Reserves play there.

Still good news for the ship jumping Wimbledon fans, so all is good.
All a bit silly. Kingstonian didn't have to sell their stadium to Wimbledon in the first place but they got into difficulty and Wimbledon were actually quite a convenient solution. Of course, once Wimbledon started changing things, there was these whispers that Wimbledon were bullying them in their own home. Not really very fair, IMO.

And really, who gives a tuppenny toss that Aldershot might lose out on Chelsea reserve money FFS? They're not entitled to have a sugar daddy big club from 40 miles away paying for their facilities. Chelsea could play reserve games anywhere. What do they (or Wimbledon) owe Aldershot?






AFC Wimbledon deserve a ground in the borough of Merton, but why there? Or why not make it a multi-purpose stadium (with the council's financial help perhaps) and show a bit of vision? I'll be gutted when that dog track goes - I lived in Wimbledon for ten years and I've been there dozens of times. If Merton Council had done their jobs properly, they could have allowed Plough Lane to be rebuilt, they could have ensured the compulsory purchase of the desolate factory land between Morden and South Wimbledon and built it there. Instead we've got this shambles, meaning that the 3000 dog racing fans every week (1500 most Fridays) and stock car racing fans will have nowhere to go. I just don't think it's fair to blame AFC Wimbledon's long suffering supporters for this. They just want their club back home.
 


Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
Have any group of MK Dons fans ever campaigned for a return to Wimbledon ? ???
 




Uncle Buck

Ghost Writer
Jul 7, 2003
28,071
This bit is total bollocks.

All a bit silly. Kingstonian didn't have to sell their stadium to Wimbledon in the first place but they got into difficulty and Wimbledon were actually quite a convenient solution. Of course, once Wimbledon started changing things, there was these whispers that Wimbledon were bullying them in their own home. Not really very fair, IMO.

And really, who gives a tuppenny toss that Aldershot might lose out on Chelsea reserve money FFS? They're not entitled to have a sugar daddy big club from 40 miles away paying for their facilities. Chelsea could play reserve games anywhere. What do they (or Wimbledon) owe Aldershot?






AFC Wimbledon deserve a ground in the borough of Merton, but why there? Or why not make it a multi-purpose stadium (with the council's financial help perhaps) and show a bit of vision? I'll be gutted when that dog track goes - I lived in Wimbledon for ten years and I've been there dozens of times. If Merton Council had done their jobs properly, they could have allowed Plough Lane to be rebuilt, they could have ensured the compulsory purchase of the desolate factory land between Morden and South Wimbledon and built it there. Instead we've got this shambles, meaning that the 3000 dog racing fans every week (1500 most Fridays) and stock car racing fans will have nowhere to go. I just don't think it's fair to blame AFC Wimbledon's long suffering supporters for this. They just want their club back home.

Sorry, I forget, the right on NSC view is to love all things Wimbledon, even though their actions are impacting on other clubs.

But as their fans are seemingly against modern football and other such trendy bollocks and probably somebody wrote a poem about them, they are good.

All sorted.
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,279
Surrey
Sorry, I forget, the right on NSC view is to love all things Wimbledon, even though their actions are impacting on other clubs.

But as their fans are seemingly against modern football and other such trendy bollocks and probably somebody wrote a poem about them, they are good.

All sorted.
What the F*CK are you talking about Piers? :lolol:

Yes, their actions are impacting other clubs. Do you want them to stay 4 miles outside the borough so that Aldershot can keep collecting Chelsea reserve money then? This is feeble.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top