Derby and Fulham bid for Dunk [+ Newcastle now interested]

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Feb 23, 2009
23,269
Brighton factually.....
There's some absolute garbage being spouted about Dunk on here. We have a fantastic young defender on our books who will continue to mature and iron out those silly mistakes. Last year we saw him come on leaps and bounds and cement a regular place. On top of that he scored a load of goals last year which is quite rare for a center half.
Do people not realize he is still young and learning? I don't think Dunk is overrated at all. Infact he is completely underrated. To many people want to sell him and fail to see he is only 23.

Unless a silly offer of 6 -7 million is being offered we should stick two fingers up at other Championship clubs.

Dunk is a key player for us and it's about time the club does everything it can to keep hold of our young stars. We don't need to sell and shouldn't.

Bingo someone with wise words
 


Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,768
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
There's some absolute garbage being spouted about Dunk on here. We have a fantastic young defender on our books who will continue to mature and iron out those silly mistakes. Last year we saw him come on leaps and bounds and cement a regular place. On top of that he scored a load of goals last year which is quite rare for a center half.
Do people not realize he is still young and learning? I don't think Dunk is overrated at all. Infact he is completely underrated. To many people want to sell him and fail to see he is only 23.

Unless a silly offer of 6 -7 million is being offered we should stick two fingers up at other Championship clubs.

Dunk is a key player for us and it's about time the club does everything it can to keep hold of our young stars. We don't need to sell and shouldn't.

Agreed, but 4-5 million is a lot of money for a Centre Half and in my opinion is a position you can replace with quality for considerably less.

Replacing attacking players is a lot harder, and it may well free up the bit of extra cash we need to get those deals done.
 


John Bumlick

Banned
Apr 29, 2007
3,483
here hare here
Baldock was not a waste of money. He's a quality finisher and would score loads if played in his correct position

But it's not about his ability, is it? I think buying a player and not using him in his correct position is a good definition of a waste of money. Extreme example but if someone bought Messi for 100 million and put him in goal, would everyone talk about how shit a goalie he is or that the club (probably Liverpool) was wasting their money?
 


perseus

Broad Blue & White stripe
Jul 5, 2003
23,459
Sūþseaxna
But it's not about his ability, is it? I think buying a player and not using him in his correct position is a good definition of a waste of money. Extreme example but if someone bought Messi for 100 million and put him in goal, would everyone talk about how shit a goalie he is or that the club (probably Liverpool) was wasting their money?

A small dwarvish striker is expected to me more than just a target man and play as a second striker, so I do not go along with playing to Baldock strengths (which we have hardly seen anyway). His does not seem to have the pace to be a real threat to the opposition. I quite like his defending when he loses the ball.

Meanwhile, I heard a rumour yesterday (Fulham end) that Fulham expect to buy Dunk for £5 million this afternoon. Translated, I think just means they have put in an increased bid.

If we are really stuck for a striker, it would be easiest to play Dunk up there. I wonder if Rohan Ince can play covering central defender? That would make for a formidable pairing if Ince has got the ability?
 




albionite

Well-known member
May 20, 2009
2,754
A small dwarvish striker is expected to me more than just a target man and play as a second striker, so I do not go along with playing to Baldock strengths (which we have hardly seen anyway). His does not seem to have the pace to be a real threat to the opposition. I quite like his defending when he loses the ball.

Meanwhile, I heard a rumour yesterday (Fulham end) that Fulham expect to buy Dunk for £5 million this afternoon. Translated, I think just means they have put in an increased bid.

If we are really stuck for a striker, it would be easiest to play Dunk up there. I wonder if Rohan Ince can play covering central defender? That would make for a formidable pairing if Ince has got the ability?

You really shouldn't be getting your rumours from football rumours ???
 


nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
13,924
Manchester
A small dwarvish striker is expected to me more than just a target man and play as a second striker, so I do not go along with playing to Baldock strengths (which we have hardly seen anyway). His does not seem to have the pace to be a real threat to the opposition. I quite like his defending when he loses the ball.

Meanwhile, I heard a rumour yesterday (Fulham end) that Fulham expect to buy Dunk for £5 million this afternoon. Translated, I think just means they have put in an increased bid.

If we are really stuck for a striker, it would be easiest to play Dunk up there. I wonder if Rohan Ince can play covering central defender? That would make for a formidable pairing if Ince has got the ability?
I've not seen enough of Baldock to make any sort of judgement on his value - 21 appearances last season, most of which were out of position. However, I have seen enough of Rohan Ince's aerial ability over the past 2 seasons to know that he is a far far better defensive midfielder than he ever will be centre back.
 


RyFish

Active member
Dec 6, 2011
283
But it's not about his ability, is it? I think buying a player and not using him in his correct position is a good definition of a waste of money. Extreme example but if someone bought Messi for 100 million and put him in goal, would everyone talk about how shit a goalie he is or that the club (probably Liverpool) was wasting their money?

Messi looks quite good to me ;-)

wpid-article-1331652557402-1224a9f8000005dc-268158_636x297.jpg
 




bhawoddy

Well-known member
Jan 25, 2011
3,621
Agreed, but 4-5 million is a lot of money for a Centre Half and in my opinion is a position you can replace with quality for considerably less.

Replacing attacking players is a lot harder, and it may well free up the bit of extra cash we need to get those deals done.

this isnt the first time you have mentioned this but , to date, you still haven't named 1 player, who can replace dunk, if he goes. And you think its an easy position to fill.........


waiting.........................................
 


Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,768
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
I have mentioned Perch at Wigan on numerous occasions as one that I would certainly bid for amongst others, good quality centre halfs can be found s whole lot easier than attacking players was my point. Bassong at Norwich is another I would bid for, loaned out by Norwich last year, and I would be surprised to see him get game time in the premier league. I'm sure the scouting team have plenty of options of required, on top of that both players I mention have played and I believe were signed by Hughton previously....
 
Last edited:


nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
13,924
Manchester
this isnt the first time you have mentioned this but , to date, you still haven't named 1 player, who can replace dunk, if he goes. And you think its an easy position to fill.........


waiting.........................................

Marshy's not a professional scout; he's an IT geek. I would expect that the people that are paid by the club to do this have a long list of potential replacements from all over Europe, for whom they could probably pay the transfer fee and wages for 4 years for £4m.
 




Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,768
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
Marshy's not a professional scout; he's an IT geek. I would expect that the people that are paid by the club to do this have a long list of potential replacements from all over Europe, for whom they could probably pay the transfer fee and wages for 4 years for £4m.

Indeed, almost sounds like you know me worryingly.....
 


Skaville

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
10,108
Queens Park
There's some absolute garbage being spouted about Dunk on here. We have a fantastic young defender on our books who will continue to mature and iron out those silly mistakes. Last year we saw him come on leaps and bounds and cement a regular place. On top of that he scored a load of goals last year which is quite rare for a center half.
Do people not realize he is still young and learning? I don't think Dunk is overrated at all. Infact he is completely underrated. To many people want to sell him and fail to see he is only 23.

Unless a silly offer of 6 -7 million is being offered we should stick two fingers up at other Championship clubs.

Dunk is a key player for us and it's about time the club does everything it can to keep hold of our young stars. We don't need to sell and shouldn't.

This with bells on. Dunk is the player we should be building the back four around, especially now GG is nearing the end. This would make the premature departures of Cook and Elphick even more nonsensical. One thing I do seem to remember is a £5m release clause in his contract but if you were Lewis Dunk, would you leave the club who have nurtured and developed you for one a handful of places up the table? I think Fulham might be exercising the right to talking to LD, but signing him might be another matter.
 












Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Marshy's not a professional scout; he's an IT geek. I would expect that the people that are paid by the club to do this have a long list of potential replacements from all over Europe, for whom they could probably pay the transfer fee and wages for 4 years for £4m.

What makes you think any of the money received will be reinvested in the team, it's not like we have a track record of re-investing anywhere near the money received for players on the team.

For this reason I really don't get fans who say "yeah go on sell him". The replacements have been mostly absolute rubbish ( but allegedly very expensive) over the last couple of years.
 




Don Tmatter

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
5,000
dont matter
Wasnt it reported couple of weeks back that he wouldnt be sold to another Championship club?
 


Bra

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2009
1,366
patcham
Looks like he's off. Anyone fancy our chances against Forest with Greer and Rea at centre back?

Assuming, of course, Greer is fit since he isnt now. Why strengten your rival whilst making yourself weaker. If you have to sell do it when its right for you not the other team
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top