Andrews instead of ince? ? ?? ???

[hybrid_x]

Don't really care if Ince was feeling a little unwell, or had too many chocolates on the 25th, to put 'mandy andrews' in place of him is insulting.

Ince is part of The Team, and if Garcia can't see that, then he has to be questioned.


sigh.

 

[Trigger]

Playing Andrews and Bridcutt together seemed to be a mistake, it shouldn't happen.

 

[Goldstone Rapper]

Don't really care if Ince was feeling a little unwell, or had too many chocolates on the 25th, to put 'mandy andrews' in place of him is insulting.

Ince is part of The Team, and if Garcia can't see that, then he has to be questioned.


sigh.

But what if Ince was very snotty? He'd have to carry a box of tissues with him throughout the match.

 

[Super Steve Earle]

I used to have a pocket in my shorts for a tissue.....

 

[supaseagull]

Exactly. Whenever we start to develop a promising young player they should be played non-stop in their first full season regardless of their fitness and without regard to their development.
Idiot.

You don't drop your best and most influential players, which Ince has been, in an important league game.

We never did it with Zamora who was the same age as Ince in his first full season with us.

 

[Albumen]

Rotation. It's not a difficult concept.

 

[Muzzy]

I get the feeling that OG thought that we could win this game without him and saved him for the 'tougher' fixtures ahead. This obviously, has backfired and would now seem to be one of the gaffers poorer decisions. Seems to me that Ince is now our 'main man' in the middle of the park but being young OG felt that he needed a 'rest'.
Who knows?

 

[Zukey Seagull]

I didn't see the game but can not comment really but in the case of Keith Andrews he should think this is my opportunity and take advantage. But seems from all the comments he was not so good.

 

[portslade seagull]

Rotation. It's not a difficult concept.

Not sure the players have grasped this yet

 

[Rookie]

I didn't see the game but can not comment really but in the case of Keith Andrews he should think this is my opportunity and take advantage. But seems from all the comments he was not so good.

I wouldn't say he was 'not so good' (or no worse than any others) but just seemed that a middle three of Bridcutt, Crofts and Andrews all wanted to do a similar job and Bridcutt was forced to play a different role to the one we know he is bloody good at. I would say its Andrews or Bridcutt not both