shaolinpunk
[Insert witty title here]
This is quite a good piece about it: http://paulbernal.wordpress.com/2013/07/22/10-questions-about-camerons-new-porn-blocking/
I'm behind this in some ways as knowledge of free pork-imaginings has lightened my own unwebbified fantasy workrate and made wonking too easy. Long gone is the day in which the second, late morning, fiddle will take an hour or more, my forearms popeye-esque and my brain a-scar with some of the odder images it dug from its animalistic recesses.
I just opted in to the 'W**kers Regsiter' and got forwarded here. Very strange.
http://tinyurl.com/mwlzswn
If someone who gets turned on by rape porn can't get their fix any more thanks to Cameron's legislation, aren't they more likely to cross the boundary from fantasy into real life?
Whereas someone who has knocked one out to such material has given their libido a workout that probably makes them less likely to be a rapist in real life.
I know there is the counter-argument that rape porn may be stepping stone to taking things into real life, but what evidence is there about how often this applies?
I listened to that. It seems that to read the Sun you need to go out and buy it....not an internet requirement. (And obviously nothing to do with Rupert Murdoch)He was interviewed on Women's Hour earlier today, and asked about whether his plans included a ban on page 3. It seems they don't and when pushed he seemed unable to give a cogent answer as to why not.
I listened to that. It seems that to read the Sun you need to go out and buy it....not an internet requirement. (And obviously nothing to do with Rupert Murdoch)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-22643862
It may not have stats but certainly points out the flaws in your arguement. Also, I have to say, if you get turned on by rape porn...thats a mental health issue, not something that should be encouraged so easily into an addition that will then manifest in real life. (Many convicted killers and rapists computers have been full of violent porn...but in the end they become dulled to it, and need the real thing to get a fix)
I'm more of the perspective that someone being turned on by rape porn (not me, I hasten to add!) should be allowed to carry on having those fantasies and even to use porn to knock one out over them. It's only a public health issue when someone applies it into their dealings with people in their life, given the enormously negative impact that real life forced sex can have on a victim.
When will an interviewer ask Cameron which was the last porn site he has knocked one out to? I wonder what he'd say.
Why you do think the net was born? porn,porn porrrrrrrrrnnnnnThe Internet is built on Porn,
Take away all the w@nkers and there'd be nobody left.
Supposedly. My view is that is a parents job, not the governments and I certainly don't appreciate being inconvenienced because of other people's children. I choose not to have children as I don't have the patience for them, I find them boring and a hassles for at least the first 17 years. Increasingly their requirements are impacting on my life with the advent of this massive consumer market for children which encompasses pubs, shops, sports centres, restaurants and on ad nauseum. Now I have to consider them if I want a ****. Will this madness ever end?