Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Katie Hopkins



Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
She doesn't seem to like the elderly either...

Privatise the Geriatric Sector

March 14th, 2012

It seems these days that there are old people everywhere: crowding out doctors surgeries, filling up buses, spilling out of hospitals and driving care homes to the point of bankruptcy. Everywhere I go someone in slippers is shuffling along behind their frame on wheels, going no-where fast with no meaningful purpose in mind.Just what is the point of all these slipper clad wrecks, washed up in the land of the living?

They make it more difficult for me to get a doctor’s appointment for my young children, they cloy up the NHS to breaking point and they are not prepared for a life that has gone on well beyond anything regarded as decent or reasonable.

This is not a cautionary tale. I have no edifying reassurance about the wisdom of the aged, no fable about the old, nor have I come to see beyond my heartless economic view.

I just wonder why are we so desperate to sustain life beyond its normal course, to the point of making certain resources unobtainable for the young, out of reach of the real living and rammed full of the not yet dead.

As we progress through life, surely the onus should be shifted from the state to the individual, requiring proof that they have provided for their elongated ‘old age’, making individuals accountable for their desire to live to the point of senility with mobility.It is time to privatise the geriatric sector, and make the individual accountable for their care when they can no longer reasonably provide it for themselves.

Those able to speak will argue ‘I paid my taxes, I have earned the right’. But those taxes only take you so far. They do not provide for a life that requires an army of agency support just to keep it hygienically clean whilst it continues to breathe.If medical advances have edged the elderly into the living incapable, clearly those medical advances need to be privatised in order to restrict them to only those that are financially able to take accountability for the outputs of this medical excellence.

A country where the old age masses outnumber the revenue generating minority is not a sustainable one, and our current population model is under question. Maybe not by Guardian readers, maybe not by the pro welfare Socialists, but certainly by business people like me who wonder when they will be able to access medical treatment for their children and taxpaying families under 60.
 




SeagullinExile

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2010
5,781
London
I'd smash her back doors in...
 


Ninja Elephant

Doctor Elephant
Feb 16, 2009
18,855
She doesn't seem to like the elderly either...

Privatise the Geriatric Sector

March 14th, 2012

It seems these days that there are old people everywhere: crowding out doctors surgeries, filling up buses, spilling out of hospitals and driving care homes to the point of bankruptcy. Everywhere I go someone in slippers is shuffling along behind their frame on wheels, going no-where fast with no meaningful purpose in mind.Just what is the point of all these slipper clad wrecks, washed up in the land of the living?

They make it more difficult for me to get a doctor’s appointment for my young children, they cloy up the NHS to breaking point and they are not prepared for a life that has gone on well beyond anything regarded as decent or reasonable.

This is not a cautionary tale. I have no edifying reassurance about the wisdom of the aged, no fable about the old, nor have I come to see beyond my heartless economic view.

I just wonder why are we so desperate to sustain life beyond its normal course, to the point of making certain resources unobtainable for the young, out of reach of the real living and rammed full of the not yet dead.

As we progress through life, surely the onus should be shifted from the state to the individual, requiring proof that they have provided for their elongated ‘old age’, making individuals accountable for their desire to live to the point of senility with mobility.It is time to privatise the geriatric sector, and make the individual accountable for their care when they can no longer reasonably provide it for themselves.

Those able to speak will argue ‘I paid my taxes, I have earned the right’. But those taxes only take you so far. They do not provide for a life that requires an army of agency support just to keep it hygienically clean whilst it continues to breathe.If medical advances have edged the elderly into the living incapable, clearly those medical advances need to be privatised in order to restrict them to only those that are financially able to take accountability for the outputs of this medical excellence.

A country where the old age masses outnumber the revenue generating minority is not a sustainable one, and our current population model is under question. Maybe not by Guardian readers, maybe not by the pro welfare Socialists, but certainly by business people like me who wonder when they will be able to access medical treatment for their children and taxpaying families under 60.

Jesus, what a nasty piece of work.

I watched some of her debates about certain things on YouTube; Andy Gray (she was against his sacking, "the country has lost its sense of humour!") and Tattoos (generic spout about them being graffiti) for example. It is amazing, I fundamentally disagree with almost everything she says.

Even worse, on The Apprentice she was actually put through to the final! She buckled and quit in the boardroom, but Sir Alan (at the time) had told her she had made it. MENTAL scenes. What a horrid and nasty piece of work. If you want a laugh, watch Michelle Mone DESTROY her on You're Fired (Season 3, Episode 11) repeatedly. Adrian Chiles couldn't/didn't want to reign her in. Nick Hewer does a hatchet job on her too.
 




FloatLeft

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2012
1,609
During the first Brighton marathon I ended up running alongside her from shoreham power station to hove lawns and we had a chat. She seemed nice enough and had amazing blue eyes. But I still wouldn't...

Funny though, the cretins in my son's class have the sort of names she mentioned (Levi, Tyler, etc)
 






mistahclarke

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2009
2,997
She should run for prime minister. I'm interested to see what policies she has for handling these children and the elderly.
 






we-8-brighton

New member
Feb 5, 2011
157
I watched this on the day and another one about a week earlier where she said that "she would choose the people her kids played with" and agree she is a hypocritical class whore with no class.
I would love to see her have to live in whitehawk, newhaven, thornton heath, west croydon, new addington etc with basic money for a year and see how she thinks she's above everyone else then.
 


BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Funny though, the cretins in my son's class have the sort of names she mentioned (Levi, Tyler, etc)

Not sure if she's for real and of course she is slightly offensive.

However the irony is that I have a friend that works with after school kids, he has a list of any behavioural issues, ADHD and the like and he has always told me how he doesnt really need a list as he can tell the ones likely to have issues down to their names, he says it tongue in cheek but it has an element of reality in it too.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,229
Not sure if she's for real and of course she is slightly offensive.

However the irony is that I have a friend that works with after school kids, he has a list of any behavioural issues, ADHD and the like and he has always told me how he doesnt really need a list as he can tell the ones likely to have issues down to their names, he says it tongue in cheek but it has an element of reality in it too.

There is an element of truth in the name thing but to judge a child and not allow your kids to play with them based on that small element is moronic.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
There is an element of truth in the name thing but to judge a child and not allow your kids to play with them based on that small element is moronic.

I fully accept that.

We can do it the other way round ( I am sure this has been said already ).

Tarquin anyone ??
 


fisons

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2005
660
Birds in glass houses should not throw stones. Katie is a Barry Crocker of a name. As John Arlott said of Bob Cunis - neither one thing nor the other. By all means if you're posh go for Katharine and Kat is a top name..... but Katie??!

Usually the name for a dog in a Janet and John book.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,229
I fully accept that.

We can do it the other way round ( I am sure this has been said already ).

Tarquin anyone ??

absolutely right

We are all guilty of making judgement based on peoples names but i think the issue with her is that not only accepts those judgements but also acts on them.
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
We are all guilty of making judgement based on peoples names but i think the issue with her is that not only accepts those judgements but also acts on them.

She's not for real ....... she is just a caricature of some nouveau riche chancer.
 


surlyseagull

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2008
843
This excuse of a woman and her remarks should be treated with the contempt they rightly deserve .
 


Tooting Gull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
11,033
I remember my brother-in-law telling me about her even before the original show was on air, she worked at the Met Office and was very unpopular there, and already had the reputation as a marriage-wrecker. So the only thing that has surprised me is that she has made this bizarre leap into 'someone we want to hear from'. Nasty, attention-seeking piece of work.
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
61,720
Chandlers Ford
I doubt she even believes half of what she says / writes, herself. Its purely to get a reaction, and more fool any of us for falling for it.

She is just Withdean Wanderer with a bigger audience and a wider subject matter.
 




The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
Why did ITV give this airhead the oxygen of publicity?

That was a nine-minute clip of utter meaninglessness. As soon as she established, fairly early on, her snobby pretentions, they should have moved on to the next story. While that Anna May was correct, she was superfluous - Hopkins' stupidity didn't need challenging; just hanging there.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here