Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Daily Mail at it again







El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,198
Pattknull med Haksprut
Typical bloody Mail, I know one University Challenge winner who went on to become a successful mass murderer.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,192
Uffern
Typical bloody Mail, I know one University Challenge winner who went on to become a successful mass murderer.

Exactly. And do they give credit for that? They just play down those sort of skills
 


Nah. They're all complete failures.

"... they are following in the footsteps of the original 1962 winners from Leicester. Geoffrey Ford, who was studying geology, went on to become a university librarian at Bristol, while his team mate John Hewitt is a lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University".
 






Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,192
Uffern
Nah. They're all complete failures.

"... they are following in the footsteps of the original 1962 winners from Leicester. Geoffrey Ford, who was studying geology, went on to become a university librarian at Bristol, while his team mate John Hewitt is a lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University".

Quite right, all joking aside, the article itself says that 40% of winners are in academia - scarcely a sign of failure.

Other previous winners, not included in the Mail article, are a former head of the Inland Revenue, an MP and a multi-millionaire head of a software company.

The article bases its assumptions on three or four people who have struggled in their lives (at least one of whom admits that he had problems before he went on UC).

I've no idea what the Mail's agenda is here - but it's rather silly.
 








Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
I don't wanna trivialise it, but isn't that like ignoring Hitler invading Poland? They shouldn't be allowed to peddle their endless drivel.

"shouldn't be allowed"

"like Hitler invading Poland"

just listen to yourselves.

Yes, you're all so much more sophisticated than the Daily Mail readers. Give yourself a pat on the back and go back to reading Polly Toynbee.

If it's untrue then complain to the press commission. If it's just that it doesn't pander to your particular predujices then don't read it. It really is that easy.
 


User removed 4

New member
May 9, 2008
13,331
Haywards Heath
"shouldn't be allowed"

"like Hitler invading Poland"

just listen to yourselves.

Yes, you're all so much more sophisticated than the Daily Mail readers. Give yourself a pat on the back and go back to reading Polly Toynbee.

If it's untrue then complain to the press commission. If it's just that it doesn't pander to your particular predujices then don't read it. It really is that easy.
:thumbsup:
 


Scampi

One of the Three
Jun 10, 2009
1,531
Denton
I can picture you now Buzzer frothing at the mouth and throwing you favourite Norman Tebbit memorial mug across the room at the nerve of people criticising your beloved Daily Mail. Never mind calm yourself down. Have a listen of Talksport and get Bushy to nip over and give you one of his special "massages".
 




Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
55,893
Surrey
I think Buzzer has a point, to be fair. That paper is not going away and nor would you want it to - that's what free speech is all about.

On a related note, I see the Evening Standard in its editorial last night promised "unbiased coverage" of the election. Hmmm. Anyone else consider this an empty promise?
 


User removed 4

New member
May 9, 2008
13,331
Haywards Heath
I can picture you now Buzzer frothing at the mouth and throwing you favourite Norman Tebbit memorial mug across the room at the nerve of people criticising your beloved Daily Mail. Never mind calm yourself down. Have a listen of Talksport and get Bushy to nip over and give you one of his special "massages".
Think ' humour ' is best left to those with a sense of it :thumbsup:
 


The Spanish

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2008
6,478
P
I think Buzzer has a point, to be fair. That paper is not going away and nor would you want it to - that's what free speech is all about.

On a related note, I see the Evening Standard in its editorial last night promised "unbiased coverage" of the election. Hmmm. Anyone else consider this an empty promise?

the only difference between the standard and the mail is restaurant reviews and about 5 hours.
 








Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
I can picture you now Buzzer frothing at the mouth and throwing you favourite Norman Tebbit memorial mug across the room at the nerve of people criticising your beloved Daily Mail. Never mind calm yourself down. Have a listen of Talksport and get Bushy to nip over and give you one of his special "massages".


My "beloved" Daily Mail? I don't read it, matey. I think it's trash.
 


Badger

NOT the Honey Badger
NSC Patron
May 8, 2007
13,433
Toronto
the only difference between the standard and the mail is restaurant reviews and about 5 hours.

...and you have to go out of your way to buy the mail where as you just pick up the standard on a train carriage
 




The Spanish

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2008
6,478
P
...and you have to go out of your way to buy the mail where as you just pick up the standard on a train carriage

exactly no one used to do that when they paid. my idea has always been a paper rack on trains, to encourage sharing and tidiness. i bet wh smith would scupper it though.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,192
Uffern
I would like to know exactly what part of them being oddball freak boffin virgins is untrue.

Mail didn't say that - they said they'd failed in life.

Obviously the part about being oddball freak boffin virgins is true
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here