[Politics] Small boats, smashing the criminal gangs and the UK job market

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Status
Not open for further replies.




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
60,646
Faversham
This simply can't be allowed to continue. The numbers are truly shocking.
Who started it? How did they facilitate it? How did they propose to deal with it?

Now you are a Farage man I suppose you are relaxed that the answer to all those questions is:
The Tories; by doing Brexit and nothing else; something sumpthink Rwanda.

Farage's solution will be to do nothing, or drown them.
Simple clear patriotic policies. :facepalm:
:shootself
 


Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
21,061
It was the then Home Secretary Priti Patel who tabled that idea. As I understand it, it was vetoed by Boris as too extreme.
Yep that’s the one, all we can hope for is rough weather and heavy seas to deter them then, 2025 will be a record breaking year if today is anything to go by, all on Starmers watch.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
NSC Patron
Oct 19, 2003
20,042
This simply can't be allowed to continue. The numbers are truly shocking.
Imagine if the grifters stirring up this shot focussed on actually doing something worthwhile to change the lives of working people.

Jimmy the giant talks about the opportunity in his latest video (from about 27 minutes if you don't want to watch it all).



We have an amazing opportunity to come together and use our numbers to fix some major problems.

Jimmy the Giant, Gary's economics and even Punters Politics in Australia are part of a wider movement that are standing up for ordinary working people against the grifters.

I feel more confident that these fellas are doing more for people than the 'look, brown people in boats' brigade.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
NSC Patron
Oct 19, 2003
20,042
Imagine if the grifters stirring up this shot focused on actually doing something worthwhile to change the lives of working people.

Jimmy the giant talks about the opportunity in his latest video (from about 27 minutes if you don't want to watch it all).



We have an amazing opportunity to come together and use our numbers to fix some major problems.

Jimmy the Giant, Gary's economics and even Punter's Politics in Australia are part of a wider movement that are standing up for ordinary working people against the grifters.

I feel more confident that these fellas are doing more for people than the 'look, brown people in boats' brigade.

If anyone is interested in this stuff, I am trying to amplify some of these voices on Blue Sky

Not been at it long but would love a follow or two to help me along.

 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
23,086
Deepest, darkest Sussex
I’m beginning to think whoever it was in the last government who suggested a wave machine was not far off the mark 😦
And how many deaths are palatable for this, in your opinion?

What safeguards are you putting in place to prevent death or injury to other users of the Channel (such as cross channel ferries, private boats and commercial shipping)?

How much additional tax are you prepared to pay for this, and where should it be levied (I personally believe an additional levy on purchases of the Mail, Express, Telegraph, Sun, Times and Spectator)?

How do you square this with international maritime law, or are you proposing we break this because we're above the law?

How do you square this with the commitments of our UN membership, or are you proposing pulling us out of that organisation?

What technology are you using to make this work? Or is this something that just works because we want it to?
 
Last edited:


BadFish

Huge Member
NSC Patron
Oct 19, 2003
20,042
And how many deaths are palatable for this, in your opinion?

What safeguards are you putting in place to prevent death or injury to other users of the Channel (such as cross channel ferries, private boats and commercial shipping)?

How much additional tax are you prepared to pay for this, and where should it be levied (I personally believe an additional levy on purchases of the Mail, Express, Telegraph, Sun, Times and Spectator)?

How do you square this with international maritime law, or are you proposing we break this because we're above the law?

How do you square this with the commitments of our UN membership, or are you proposing pulling us out of that organisation?

What technology are you using to make this work? Or is this something that just works because we want it to?
Woah now, this is very in-depth thinking for such populist bullshit rhetoric.

Next, you'll be asking for justification for the popularity of Farage 🤣

This discussion simply cannot cope with delving any deeper than 'there are X number of brown people in boats crossing the channel"
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
51,537
Gloucester
And how many deaths are palatable for this, in your opinion?

What safeguards are you putting in place to prevent death or injury to other users of the Channel (such as cross channel ferries, private boats and commercial shipping)?

How much additional tax are you prepared to pay for this, and where should it be levied (I personally believe an additional levy on purchases of the Mail, Express, Telegraph, Sun, Times and Spectator)?

How do you square this with international maritime law, or are you proposing we break this because we're above the law?

How do you square this with the commitments of our UN membership, or are you proposing pulling us out of that organisation?

What technology are you using to make this work? Or is this something that just works because we want it to?
Absolutely! When the traffickers are packing people on to inflatable boats, they should of course go through rigorous health and safety checks before launching them on their voyage.
Just need the French to organise it. Shouldn't be a problem.
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
29,381
Warning issued for abuse
I’m beginning to think whoever it was in the last government who suggested a wave machine was not far off the mark 😦

So after years of you constantly campaigning and voting to increase immigration, and forcing people into people smugglers and channel crossings directly resulting in

Boat Crossings
(Numbers weren't recorded prior to 2018 as the government thought them inconsequential).
2018 - 299
2019 - 1,890
2020 - 8,466
2021 - 28,526
2022 - 45,755
2023 - 29,437
2024 - 36,816

You've now decided it's not sufficient to force these poor sods into the channel, and you want to straight out murder them in the channel ?

It's lucky I just think you're a c*** because if I'm sure if I called you a c*** that would break NSC rules :rolleyes:
 


BadFish

Huge Member
NSC Patron
Oct 19, 2003
20,042
You don’t agree with International Maritime Law? You want to drown people?

If only we had an agreement to return them, say like the Dublin Treaty. Whatever happened to that?
Its amazing to me that someone would publicly advocate for killing people before they consider how they have ended up at that point.

How does a person lose sight of sanity in this manner? Those that lead them to this place have a lot to answer for.

Its so very sad.
 


Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
21,061
Looking at the wave height forecast for the coming week i’m not surprised the estimated 1,200 unauthorised arrivals opted for Saturday……

IMG_2356.jpeg
 






Randy McNob

> > > > > > Cardiff > > > > >
Jun 13, 2020
4,899
So after years of you constantly campaigning and voting to increase immigration, and forcing people into people smugglers and channel crossings directly resulting in

Boat Crossings
(Numbers weren't recorded prior to 2018 as the government thought them inconsequential).
2018 - 299
2019 - 1,890
2020 - 8,466
2021 - 28,526
2022 - 45,755
2023 - 29,437
2024 - 36,816

You've now decided it's not sufficient to force these poor sods into the channel, and you want to straight out murder them in the channel ?

It's lucky I just think you're a c*** because if I'm sure if I called you a c*** that would break NSC rules :rolleyes:
All post Brexit, and post Voting in the Johnson cabal on a 'take back control of our borders' ticket

Vote idiots, get idiocy
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
23,086
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Absolutely! When the traffickers are packing people on to inflatable boats, they should of course go through rigorous health and safety checks before launching them on their voyage.
Just need the French to organise it. Shouldn't be a problem.
So you’re saying we should have as cavalier an attitude to innocent lives as a country as people smuggling gangs do?
 








Official Old Man

Uckfield Seagull
Aug 27, 2011
9,715
Brighton
Having witnessed for myself three of my favourite hotels being taken over by the government, I'll explain what 1000 imigrants will cost in simple terms.
Travelodge Brighton Seafront, Queens Hotel, Old Ship Hotel and The Grand would be needed to house them, presuming two to a room.
These hotels have all their staff sacked, on the spot. No staff needed.
Next security is needed so a few security staff employed.
Hotel would be paid a very good rate.
When the contract ends the hotel is left 'as new' (I witnessed this), fully decorated top to bottom, complete new furniture and bedding.
All this just for the arrivals in one day.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
NSC Patron
Oct 19, 2003
20,042
Having witnessed for myself three of my favourite hotels being taken over by the government, I'll explain what 1000 imigrants will cost in simple terms.
Travelodge Brighton Seafront, Queens Hotel, Old Ship Hotel and The Grand would be needed to house them, presuming two to a room.
These hotels have all their staff sacked, on the spot. No staff needed.
Next security is needed so a few security staff employed.
Hotel would be paid a very good rate.
When the contract ends the hotel is left 'as new' (I witnessed this), fully decorated top to bottom, complete new furniture and bedding.
All this just for the arrivals in one day.
All this because your previous government thought this was a better idea than giving people proper routes to claim asylum and processing them.

You've got yourself in a proper mess over this which apparently has lead to people with actual working brains advocating for wave machines to kill people in dinghies.

Moral compasses have gone haywire.

But still it's a vote winner for Farage!!
 




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
59,045
Back in Sussex
He's clearly above NSC moderating decisions along with a couple of his mates.
No one is above the rules.

But if no one reports abusive posts, and no one had, it relies on a moderator just coming across a bad post, which doesn't always happen.

So, please help us police NSC by reporting bad behaviour.

It's a lot better approach than bitching that nothing has happened. Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
59,045
Back in Sussex
All this because your previous government thought this was a better idea than giving people proper routes to claim asylum and processing them.
I ask this in entirely good faith: what has the current government done to open safe asylum application routes that don't rely on taking huge risks in small boats?

Because, surely that should be a big part of solving the problem.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top