They really do, sadly.Slo motion from various angles - none of them show the ball hitting below Mitoma's t-shirt line.
They really do, sadly.Slo motion from various angles - none of them show the ball hitting below Mitoma's t-shirt line.
Indeed. Maybe Attwell considers his initial decision was indeed blatantly wrong?What happened to not over-ruling original decision unless blatantly wrong?
Nope. If it's in the build up to a goal.I am puzzled though. His arm was in a 'natural position'. So - given our penalty shout was ruled out because the defender's arm was in a 'natural position', what's the difference? I thought it was only if it hit the scorer's arm it was ruled out?
That was my thought. Maybe 'natural position' only applies to penalty appeals?I am puzzled though. His arm was in a 'natural position'. So - given our penalty shout was ruled out because the defender's arm was in a 'natural position', what's the difference? I thought it was only if it hit the scorer's arm it was ruled out?
Yes. But why would VAR want to let the facts (or common sense) get in the way? There is GLORY for them if they can just be seen to be important and relevant to the result.I am puzzled though. His arm was in a 'natural position'. So - given our penalty shout was ruled out because the defender's arm was in a 'natural position', what's the difference? I thought it was only if it hit the scorer's arm it was ruled out?
I don't think that's written in the laws though.Nope. If it's in the build up to a goal.
It's like a hot potato.Yes. But why would VAR want to let the facts (or common sense) get in the way? There is GLORY for them if they can just be seen to be important and relevant to the result.
( unts.![]()
A small help, but we need something from this game.Newcastle own goal 1-1
A shirt's sleeve line is the hem attaching the sleeve to the torso. From that line down anywhere when a goal is scored is deemed to be offside.Slo motion from various angles - none of them show the ball hitting below Mitoma's t-shirt line.