[Politics] Musk (real life Bond villain planning world domination) needs a thread.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



BBassic

I changed this.
Jul 28, 2011
13,654
Look, at the risk of an infraction from the mods I'm going to say this: Crawley Dingo is a probably an idiot. Or a troll. Or both.

Replying to him is a f***ing waste of your time.

He's not interested in discussion, he's not interested in debate. He's trolling. That's it.

Stop giving him your time and effort because he is not worth it in the slightest.

Again, he's a cretin. Or a troll. Or both.

Carry on if you want but there are far more enjoyable things in life to be getting on with.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,398
Goldstone
He withdrew the posts when it was shown as fake.

But he shouldn't have posted it in the first place. What fact checking did he do to be sure it was real before posting?

By the time he removed it, his followers had seen it, and his goal of trolling had been achieved.
 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
15,605
Almería
Look, at the risk of an infraction from the mods I'm going to say this: Crawley Dingo is a probably an idiot. Or a troll. Or both.

Replying to him is a f***ing waste of your time.

He's not interested in discussion, he's not interested in debate. He's trolling. That's it.

Stop giving him your time and effort because he is not worth it in the slightest.

Again, he's a cretin. Or a troll. Or both.

Carry on if you want but there are far more enjoyable things in life to be getting on with.

I vote we get a real dingo that's sympathetic to Maga aims as it might provide more reasoned debate than the antipodean canine lost in Crawley
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,398
Goldstone
Look, at the risk of an infraction from the mods I'm going to say this: Crawley Dingo is a probably an idiot. Or a troll. Or both.

Replying to him is a f***ing waste of your time.

He's not interested in discussion, he's not interested in debate. He's trolling. That's it.

If he's just trolling, shouldn't he simply be banned?

Fortunately he's off for a month, so we can all have a break.
 






SkirlieWirlie

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2024
423
You can look it up right?

I've wasted to much time on petty attacks, paywall/firewall blah blah blah. This is not a civil environment, I will not dance to your tune or anyone else's so the other 5 posts wont get a response. I'm of to read football threads.
😂 Good one 😂 😂 😂

827c8d169518fb3497ceb56760fbb121.gif
 


bhafc99

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2003
7,713
Dubai
IMG_5087.jpeg
 


rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,349
There has been various examples given, total amounts like upcoming arrests etc are in the pipeline. Be patient, Trumps been in office 2 months and already Elon has gutted one agency already and has been in a few others.

All the non fraudulent spending has been re-instated and moved.
With your travails, how many people have you converted?
 








BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
19,720
I feel I should let everyone know that I will be unable to post any evidence of my claims if I get more than 5 replies.

This is entirely logical and not clownlike in the slightest.

Thank you
 






maffew

Well-known member
Dec 10, 2003
9,329
Worcester England
I have fact checked this and found they reported it as “fact checking” because Zuckerberg called them “fact checkers” when he announced they were being laid off.

View attachment 198837
Here’s the video.


Pisses me off this, Zuckerberg is a total nob, whinging about European rules. Him, bezos, and musk have pretty much got a do what you like card from Trump. IMO Facebooks, and Instas, should not be a place for pretty much unmoderated free speech, because free speech can be ugly and it's not always ok everywhere. Just because comments and opinions are legal absolutely does not mean it'd ok for everyone's ears.

If he wants the rules that way then we need to follow Australia and ban social media for under 16s, Inc Facebook and Instagram and these accounts need to be verified in someway the same as we have to verify when creating an account with say a bookmaker

These are meant to be social sites

Sorry Zuckerberg if you don't like EU and UK restrictions and challenges to your platforms and the risks that they bring to OUR children then f*** off with them out of our internet space. GDPR and our online safety bills have been made for a reason

Hope Ofcom start to come down hard on these tech companies when unfiltered shit keeps coming through and has the balls to block them entirely if they cant meet the rules that WE decide, not Zuckerberg or Musk or the US government
 








Deportivo Seagull

I should coco
Jul 22, 2003
5,946
Mid Sussex
It’s good that he’s this angry, it shows he knows he’s being held accountable. More fight please, judiciary.
And he’s likely to make himself look an even bigger prick than he already is. He’s spent most of his life doing as he pleases, the fact that various parts of the US government and judicial system are pushing back will be a new thing for him. He’s in for a rough ride.
 


maffew

Well-known member
Dec 10, 2003
9,329
Worcester England
“The only way to restore rule of the people in America is to impeach judges,” Musk tweeted on 25 February

Imagine someone actually writing and believing that. Literally that's like saying law and order shouldn't be a thing, might as well tear up the rule books, rip up the constitution. Lord of the Flies stuff.
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
2,285
in a house
“The only way to restore rule of the people in America is to impeach judges,” Musk tweeted on 25 February

Imagine someone actually writing and believing that. Literally that's like saying law and order shouldn't be a thing, might as well tear up the rule books, rip up the constitution. Lord of the Flies stuff.
To Trump/Musk & their pals laws are only good when they agree with them.
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
59,669
Faversham
WRT trolling, it can be hard to distinguish from simple communal-garden stupidtitty.

Rather than banning people for trolling, perhaps the mods might consider it a red flag
if someone repeatedly posts pejorative one liners such as 'two tier Kier' as 'humour' (abuse) rather than as fair comment (it could be on occasion),
or repeatedly posts falsehoods from the hairy-arse end of social media,
and fails to acknowledge their mistake and/or adds in 'confirmatory' whataboutery when called out,
on a regular basis.
As their primary way of interacting on NSC.

This was the modus operandi of 'das reich' and yet he was banned in the end (I think) for abuse rather than trolling.

When the only time I ever seen any evidence of one of the worst goons I have on ignore
is when others quote their post to call it out (for one of the bits of fuckwittery listed above)
it says to me said fuckwit is stinking the places out and needs to be thrown in the sea. :shrug:

This is not about personal politics. I am entirely relaxed about one pro-Trump poster.
And I have a prominent left winger on ignore,
despite myself being a member of the party of the horny-handed sons of toil, and apparently red in tooth and claw.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top