Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)











peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
13,052
Stil perpetuating his bullshit about fantasy soldiers being surrounded and only he was able to save.

Every western national intelligence agency, including his own, plus Ukraine, plus US journalists from FOX have said its bullshit, but he still persists?

 
Last edited:






Nobby

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2007
3,012
That’s the Crimea occupied in 2014……..before the 2018 World Cup and Winter Olympics. That Crimea?
Yes that’s the one. Keep up Mr troll.
You must be really enjoying sitting behind your little keyboard and trying to wind people up who are worried about family and friends being bombed and shot.
Keep up with the devils work. Such a sad existence - no real friends - just having to engage on here.
Maybe talk to someone about your problems
 


Deportivo Seagull

I should coco
Jul 22, 2003
5,942
Mid Sussex
I’m just trying to join up some of your considerations.

Europe is not acting in unison, it is evident that the UK and France are considering more options, including putting troops in Ukraine. In contrast Germany, Poland and Italy have ruled that out.

It’s you that said Europe could push “busted flush” Russia out of the occupied territories if it wanted to. I doubt it’s that simple and I certainly doubt “Europe” has the stomach for substantive casualties, the UK in particular.

Similarly, if Europe is upping its game in both rearming and backfilling the supplies/technology the US is going to cease supplying someone will have to pay. I am not sure European economies are in strong order either. The politics of getting European taxpayers on board for that is not straightforward.

This country only paid its debt to the US for WW2 in 2006.
I’ve answered these before and you asking again hoping for a different answer is tedious and the act of a troll and a knob or that you aren’t very bright. The choice is yours.

A united Europe doesn’t mean every European country would consider putting boots on ground. Support comes in many different ways.

War is never simple and you assuming ‘busted flush’ relates to ‘simple’ shows a lack of understanding. You still have to be tactically sound, if not it’s a mess. Ask Putin as he would know.

Necessity tends to focus minds and at the moment minds are very focused …. unlike yours at the moment.
 
Last edited:


















Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,389
Goldstone
I said it before, the best conceivable outcome is an imperfect peace. That’s not great for Ukraine but would suit the taxpayers in Europe and the US.

By 'imperfect peace', I assume you mean where the countries keep the land they have, and Ukraine are given security guarantees from the West (like joining Nato) to make sure Russia don't come back for more?

Although I don't agree that that is the best outcome, it's not the worst.
 




Deportivo Seagull

I should coco
Jul 22, 2003
5,942
Mid Sussex
By 'imperfect peace', I assume you mean where the countries keep the land they have, and Ukraine are given security guarantees from the West (like joining Nato) to make sure Russia don't come back for more?

Although I don't agree that that is the best outcome, it's not the worst.
You can always judge the metal of a person when their overriding concern is money. Old Cunning whathisface has a thing about paying tax and clearly the issue in Ukraine is whether people will pay tax rather than the death and destruction caused by Putin.
 




Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
24,739
Brighton
You can always judge the metal of a person when their overriding concern is money. Old Cunning whathisface has a thing about paying tax and clearly the issue in Ukraine is whether people will pay tax rather than the death and destruction caused by Putin.
Indeed.

I think that sums the poster up perfectly. The ultimate nimby, if it doesn’t directly affect him, he has no care. But if government policy means more tax, no matter the reasoning, he is against it. I suspect money is by far and away the most important thing in his life.
 






chickens

Have you considered masterly inactivity?
NSC Patron
Oct 12, 2022
3,147
Ye gods people, stick him on ignore.

This has been a decent informative thread for years, and it’s become one troll’s personal wind-up thread. Every time I come on here now and there’s more than a page of updates, it’s always people responding to something idiotic posted by a single poster.

He’s been on my ignore list for several years, so I’m spared his idiocy, but it’s depressing to see good people wasting their time responding.

Deprive him of the attention he craves, it’s all that stops him. He’s no genuine desire to know anything regarding this conflict, he just wants to keep you responding to him, as it dilutes the overall useful and informative nature of the thread.
 


Deportivo Seagull

I should coco
Jul 22, 2003
5,942
Mid Sussex
Ye gods people, stick him on ignore.

This has been a decent informative thread for years, and it’s become one troll’s personal wind-up thread. Every time I come on here now and there’s more than a page of updates, it’s always people responding to something idiotic posted by a single poster.

He’s been on my ignore list for several years, so I’m spared his idiocy, but it’s depressing to see good people wasting their time responding.

Deprive him of the attention he craves, it’s all that stops him. He’s no genuine desire to know anything regarding this conflict, he just wants to keep you responding to him, as it dilutes the overall useful and informative nature of the thread.
To be honest I find him amusing, I bet his lips move when he reads what he types. he/it/they (i bet he just loves pro-nouns) are a reminder that world is populated by wankers.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here