[Albion] Was it a red?

[dazzer6666]

100% red. We’d be going nuts if one the other way wasn’t given.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

Yes a red but Tarkowski should also have had one. Ref very quick to book Albion players and manager, lenient with Everton. Scared of Dyche is my conclusion who behaved way worse than RDZ on the touchline.

Tarko did similar in his last game against Palarse. And smirked when he got away with it. Cheating thug.

 

[Farehamseagull]

He didn’t mean to do it but it is 100% a red.

We’d have been fuming if that was on one of our players.

 

[Hugo Rune]

Match Officials Mic'd Up: Why Gusto yellow card became a red

Listen to the conversation between the VAR and the referee Jarred Gillett that led to Chelsea's Malo Gusto being sent off against Aston Villa

www.premierleague.com

Not completely identical, but the same sort of thing - going in a bit hard, more related to the follow through than deliberate.


Again, follow through

That’s exactly what’s wrong with VAR.

That’s not a red card either.

When the player goes in for the tackle, only the ball is there. It’s a classic 50-50. The opposition players’s leg only appears once the tackling player has made contact with the ball.

Critically, the opposition player does not need to dive in for a 50/50 too late. He is putting his leg into a challenge TOO LATE to take the ball. There is only one outcome if you blindly look at the image without considering the fact that the fouled player MISSED THE BALL and thus, put themselves into a vulnerable position.

Only a red on slo-mo.

 

[oldboyroy]

Stonewall red

 

[Sussexscots]

Yes.

Tarkowski should have gone. Ref bottled it.

 

[Beach Hut]

Red card all day long, unless Billy was a Man Utd player

 

[indy3050]

I was in the west and didn’t even think it was a foul

 

[Springal]

Thought it was a red in real time (I thought it was Lallana) and think it’s a red now

 

[WATFORD zero]

Soft red. He got the ball and caught the player on the follow through. Under today's rules, it's a red.

Bit frustrating that it gets the same penalty as the Holgate assault on Mitoma though.

 

[Bodian]

Soft red. He got the ball and caught the player on the follow through. Under today's rules, it's a red.

Bit frustrating that it gets the same penalty as the Holgate assault on Mitoma though.

We need ORANGE

 

[Frutos]

100% red.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Harry Maguire today...

Bit blurry, looks like he gets the foot and not higher up?

I guess that would be the only reason it's not a red.

 

[Littlemo]

That’s exactly what’s wrong with VAR.

That’s not a red card either.

When the player goes in for the tackle, only the ball is there. It’s a classic 50-50. The opposition players’s leg only appears once the tackling player has made contact with the ball.

Critically, the opposition player does not need to dive in for a 50/50 too late. He is putting his leg into a challenge TOO LATE to take the ball. There is only one outcome if you blindly look at the image without considering the fact that the fouled player MISSED THE BALL and thus, put themselves into a vulnerable position.

Only a red on slo-mo.

Yeah that has annoyed for years! I’ve seen it punished loads but what is the player meant to do? They’ve played the ball and someone else has stuck their leg in.

 

[Iggle Piggle]

Under today's rules, it's a red. Whether the rules are right is a different question. It certainly seems unfair that Maguire had a zero game ban and Holgate and Billy have a 3 game ban each.

 

[scooter1]

Yes it was a red, but then so was Maguires . Although apparently that wasn’t…….

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

That’s exactly what’s wrong with VAR.

That’s not a red card either.

When the player goes in for the tackle, only the ball is there. It’s a classic 50-50. The opposition players’s leg only appears once the tackling player has made contact with the ball.

Critically, the opposition player does not need to dive in for a 50/50 too late. He is putting his leg into a challenge TOO LATE to take the ball. There is only one outcome if you blindly look at the image without considering the fact that the fouled player MISSED THE BALL and thus, put themselves into a vulnerable position.

Only a red on slo-mo.

I think you need to re-read the current laws.

 

[Hugo Rune]

100% red.

I really don’t think VAR would intervene and overturn a yellow there. At the same time, there was too much in the tackle for VAR to interfere.

 

[The Wookiee]

Although both challenges getting the same punishment doesn't quite sit right.

What also doesn’t sit right is Holgate was only given a yellow before VAR intervened.
Gilmour got a straight red

 

[BBassic]

Definitely a red. Really frustrating as we've seen tackles like that that haven't been given. Doesn't make it less of a red.