Insulate Britain protests

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
18,222
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Undoubtedly, like almost every politician and us, a life of positives and not so proud moments.

But his relentless work against the genocidal National Socialists from 1933 onwards, when most of the rest of the nation and elsewhere thought he was a loon, plus his charismatic, cut through the red tape, leadership from 1940 to 1945 …. outweighs anything. Others would’ve thrown in the UK towel. How more tens of millions of Slavs, Jews, intellectuals, homosexuals and disabled would’ve been murdered or starved to death in that enduring Europe?

Oh I agree wholeheartedly with virtually everything there. What I think counts against Churchill during this period is his indifferent, many would say callous, attitude to the Bengal famine which tarnishes that period (only slightly mind). However I personally (with my historian hat on) am loathed to look at someone during a single period and make a judgement on them for that alone, when analysing Churchill the historical figure we also have to include his terrible handling of the Gold Standard debacle of the 1920s, his actions in South Africa around the turn of the century, and of course his flounce at failing to win the 1945 election he felt he deserved to.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
64,700
Withdean area
Oh I agree wholeheartedly with virtually everything there. What I think counts against Churchill during this period is his indifferent, many would say callous, attitude to the Bengal famine which tarnishes that period (only slightly mind). However I personally (with my historian hat on) am loathed to look at someone during a single period and make a judgement on them for that alone, when analysing Churchill the historical figure we also have to include his terrible handling of the Gold Standard debacle of the 1920s, his actions in South Africa around the turn of the century, and of course his flounce at failing to win the 1945 election he felt he deserved to.

1945 - the country was tired of war, he was 70 years old and seen as part of times past, a New Dawn (Fades) was sought across Europe. The NHS and rebuilds of cities with a very poor man's version of Bauhaus and Corbusier - later muggers delights, concrete cancer and bulldozing real communities.
 




The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,675
West is BEST
Unfortunately he has a free pass to troll endlessly and has successfully diverted yet another thread to the pit. Any return fire and the hotline to mod towers begins to ring ... same old same old :shrug:








Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk


For all your stoic pretence and school of hard knocks bluster, you lot don’t half cry and whinge like a load of softies when a mod pulls you up on something.
 






GrizzlingGammon

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
1,819
What I find astonishing I get a warning from his mates “Please stop trolling WZ” yet he’s allowed to get away with content like this

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Unfortunately he has a free pass to troll endlessly and has successfully diverted yet another thread to the pit. Any return fire and the hotline to mod towers begins to ring ... same old same old :shrug:

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk



You carry on wrapped up in cotton wool nibble
Regards
DF


Today the board is full of IMG_20210922_174307.jpg

Whine and whinge. Boohoohoo.
 


Lever

Well-known member
Feb 6, 2019
5,389
In my experience with old Winston in the last few years it's less "he's a baddie" but more "he's not as unquestionably good as he was seen as being a few decades ago".

...in other words not a saint
 






Hamilton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
12,551
Brighton
I look at this practically and strategically, as I do with other key 'matters of the day'. I also believe in persuasion, conciliation, as I've said before "boxing clever". As an environmentalist to an extent decades before anyone else gave a jot, I loved the work of Jonathan Porritt and others.

This is pushing more of the hoi polloi into the hands of the Daily Mail and climate change deniers.

The government aren't hurt by the M25 being blocked. The wall of silence from Labour is telling, they sense the mood music.

The cliche all publicity is good publicity isn't always true.

Imho.

Like you, I've been an environmentalist for longer than I can remember. That's a lie. I can remember.

I started out in the marketing team at The Body Shop in the early 90s, back in the times when everyone was screaming 'freaks' at us; laughing at the aspirations and trying to question and unpick everything we did. I've watched decades of failure to engage with the issues.

I actually find it rather funny how firms like bp are lauding their NetZero campaign now, 30 years too late.

I get your humble opinion.

I guess that in my humble opinion I've watched the issue be ignored for decades, and we now have a matter of a few years left to address it. We simply can't gamble on governments doing the right thing without some direct action. I've written enough letters to my MP (which was pointless, as for many years she was Caroline Lucas.)
 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,393
I guess that in my humble opinion I've watched the issue be ignored for decades, and we now have a matter of a few years left to address it. We simply can't gamble on governments doing the right thing without some direct action. I've written enough letters to my MP (which was pointless, as for many years she was Caroline Lucas.)

the issue hasnt been ignored, the solution has. we've reduced emissions by some 40-odd% in twenty years, more than the rest of the G7. we've shifted to solar and wind despite the shortcomings and that's why we have the current energy issue. sure we could save more consumption from better insulation, even best case it'll help a couple %. if the environmentalist didnt roadblock the nuclear solution we'd be done, there's not another way to power developed world reliably.
 




KeegansHairPiece

New member
Jan 28, 2016
1,829
the issue hasnt been ignored, the solution has. we've reduced emissions by some 40-odd% in twenty years, more than the rest of the G7. we've shifted to solar and wind despite the shortcomings and that's why we have the current energy issue. sure we could save more consumption from better insulation, even best case it'll help a couple %. if the environmentalist didnt roadblock the nuclear solution we'd be done, there's not another way to power developed world reliably.

You're blaming environmentalist for our nuclear energy development, seriously? Does that dismiss our reliance on foreign contractors, companies and investment, along with Toshiba shutting down NuGen, Hitachi putting an indefinite hold on a new power plant at Angelsey. Hinckley Point C is projected to cost £22bn and rising - and not without risk given the same reactor at Taishan, China has been shut down this summer due to fears of a leak.

But yeah, must be the pesky environmentalists that have stopped it, not cost, investment, practicalities etc.
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
17,676
Gods country fortnightly
the issue hasnt been ignored, the solution has. we've reduced emissions by some 40-odd% in twenty years, more than the rest of the G7. we've shifted to solar and wind despite the shortcomings and that's why we have the current energy issue. sure we could save more consumption from better insulation, even best case it'll help a couple %. if the environmentalist didnt roadblock the nuclear solution we'd be done, there's not another way to power developed world reliably.

I really dispute the 40% bollocks

Doesn't include shipping
Doesn't include air transport
Doesn't take into account outsource emissions to the developing world

We've done the easy bit, now we need a proper plan and I don't see one
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
18,222
Deepest, darkest Sussex
[tweet]1440935676317511684[/tweet]
 






JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
For all your stoic pretence and school of hard knocks bluster, you lot don’t half cry and whinge like a load of softies when a mod pulls you up on something.
Oh come along Clampy, just pointing out what we all know to be true. We all play the game to varying degrees (fair enough) whereas the true snowflakes are the ones who troll endlesselly looking for a bite then continually report posts as they can't take what they dish out..

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,393
I really dispute the 40% bollocks

well thats about the figure thats publically acknowledged. or 50% since 1990.
certainly are other emissions exported. if you want to focus no people shipping in goods from across the world and their air travel, i agree. cant say the problem is ignored and we have done nothing.

UK-territorial-greenhouse-gas-emissions-1990-2020-millions-of-tonnes-of-CO2-equivalent.png
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,393
But yeah, must be the pesky environmentalists that have stopped it, not cost, investment, practicalities etc.

so environmentalists are now pro-nuclear? i do hope so.
 




The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,675
West is BEST
Oh come along Clampy, just pointing out what we all know to be true. We all play the game to varying degrees (fair enough) whereas the true snowflakes are the ones who troll endlesselly looking for a bite then continually report posts as they can't take what they dish out..

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

Who's reporting you? I think you may have a heightened sense of your own importance. I would say it's more likely that you troll and "banter" and then go overboard and get banned or ticked off or whatever. Perhaps learn to set some boundaries for yourself. But as usual, someone else's fault. As I say, for all your puffed out chests, your little clique sure do get upset easily.
But you're all part of NSC's rich pattern and alright in my book.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
26,069
Who's reporting you? I think you may have a heightened sense of your own importance. I would say it's more likely that you troll and troll and troll and then go overboard and get banned or ticked off or whatever. Perhaps learn to set some boundaries for yourself. But as usual, someone else's fault. As I say, for all your puffed out chests, your little clique sure do get upset easily.
But you're all part of NSC's rich pattern and alright in my book.

It's the same with [MENTION=534]Chicken Run[/MENTION]. He's absolutely sure that people are reporting him and getting him banned :facepalm:

As I think we found out a few weeks back, all it takes is a few people too busy to post in the Bear Pit for a day or two, and they simply go full on tantrum and get themselves banned without any help from anybody :lolol:
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top