Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Cricket] **** Yorkshire v Sussex match thread ***



rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
4,626
If a player is Under 18 there is a limit to the number of overs they can bowl in a spell. It's to protect them from being over-bowled.

Yes. 5 overs max in a spell. But Dan is an offy; he isn't running in 40 yards and bowling at 90mph. Stupid rule.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,907
If a player is Under 18 there is a limit to the number of overs they can bowl in a spell. It's to protect them from being over-bowled.

Glad it wasn't around in my day. I took an end for the whole innings.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,907
Yes. 5 overs max in a spell. But Dan is an offy; he isn't running in 40 yards and bowling at 90mph. Stupid rule.

Maximum is 7 for anyone over 16. 18 overs in a day.

It doesn't apply to spinners.
 


MJsGhost

Oooh Matron, I'm an
NSC Patron
Jun 26, 2009
4,620
East
Yes. 5 overs max in a spell. But Dan is an offy; he isn't running in 40 yards and bowling at 90mph. Stupid rule.

Quite a rapid action for an offy? ???

[TWEET]1400816897688543240[/TWEET]
 




Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,408
Uffern
According to the Guardian's County Championship ***live*** coverage, Dan Ibrahim is the youngest player to make fifty on debut in the Championship. :clap2: :clap2: :clap2:

He's the youngest player to make a 50 in the CC full stop. It just happens to be his debut too.

That's some record, seeing the CC has been going for nearly 150 years (he's nowhere near the youngest in FC cricket though. Tendulkar scored his first test 50 at a younger age)
 


DJ NOBO

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2004
6,416
Wiltshire
Malan dropped by Head ... he's really reinforcing his claim to be Sussex's worst ever overseas player

Lol.
That title is surely safe.
Trav has bigger plans - worst ever Sussex signing. The nominations are?
 


vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,936
If a player is Under 18 there is a limit to the number of overs they can bowl in a spell. It's to protect them from being over-bowled.

I believe that's known as an " Archer" ...
 




Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
There is a sad absence of glamour in the Sussex team these days - aka the psychopath fast bowler from Pakistan, South Africa, West Indies, wherever, who's whole point in life is to (nearly) take somebody's head off.

Previous holders of the title include Messrs Snow, Khan, Le Roux, Stephenson.

Currently vacant.

Also the batsman who can score runs against anyone regardless. Previous holders include Messrs Miandad, Goodwin Bevan and Wessels.

Currently vacant.

It's been a while.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,408
Uffern
There is a sad absence of glamour in the Sussex team these days - aka the psychopath fast bowler from Pakistan, South Africa, West Indies, wherever, who's whole point in life is to (nearly) take somebody's head off.

Previous holders of the title include Messrs Snow, Khan, Le Roux, Stephenson.

Currently vacant.

Also the batsman who can score runs against anyone regardless. Previous holders include Messrs Miandad, Goodwin Bevan and Wessels.

Currently vacant.

It's been a while.

TBF, there's a lack of big names all around the county circuit. Glamorgan have got Labuschagne but there's no-one else. Where are Smith, Kohli, Warner. Jadeja, Ashwin, Pant? Where are Cummins, Starc, Bumrah, Rabada, Yasir, Holder?

We had some good players back in the days but Hampshire had Greenidge and Richards, Notts had Rice and Hadlee, Somerset had Richards and Garner etc

Having said that, Head is a poor an overseas player as we've had - Pringle was pretty bad but I think Head's worse
 


Aug 13, 2020
1,482
Darlington
TBF, there's a lack of big names all around the county circuit. Glamorgan have got Labuschagne but there's no-one else. Where are Smith, Kohli, Warner. Jadeja, Ashwin, Pant? Where are Cummins, Starc, Bumrah, Rabada, Yasir, Holder?

We had some good players back in the days but Hampshire had Greenidge and Richards, Notts had Rice and Hadlee, Somerset had Richards and Garner etc

Having said that, Head is a poor an overseas player as we've had - Pringle was pretty bad but I think Head's worse

It's not as if Lambischagne's scored many runs for Glamorgan, albeit his 40 odd in their current game against Lancs will probably turn out to be pretty crucial.

Williamson's turned out for Yorkshire fairly frequently over the last however many years. Except the South Africans like Kyle Abbott or Harmer, most of the big name overseas players seem to be batsmen looking to get half a season's experience in England. Or otherwise people at the tail end of their career like Sangakarra at Surrey, or maybe Roach this season.
 












GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
47,000
Gloucester
Malan should be at Lord's, especially given his Middlesex career.

Hindsight! Was never really impressed with him for England, TBH. He's certainly taking advantage of a good wicket and an inexperienced bowling attack (who, TBF, aren't bowling badly).
 




Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
We just might not be able to win this one.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
47,000
Gloucester
We just might not be able to win this one.

Errmm ....................

Good rearguard action, especially by young Orr. Out a little while ago for 67 - pretty good debut fr the young man. Now - what's ot to be? Dogged resistance or roll over and have our tummy tickled?
 




Aug 13, 2020
1,482
Darlington
Errmm ....................

Good rearguard action, especially by young Orr. Out a little while ago for 67 - pretty good debut fr the young man. Now - what's ot to be? Dogged resistance or roll over and have our tummy tickled?

Head getting his average for the season into double figures would be a good start.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here