And they said you'd lost it......They should just ignore the media.
And they said you'd lost it......They should just ignore the media.
They are absolutely terrible and generally from Box Parks (much like the crap Brighton FA Cup semi final one) but they are definitely not ‘forced’The ones that they've shown on BBC/ITV from the games so far have been from limited number of venues and looked like very forced celebrations from the punters to be honest.
So predictable - as was so accurately predicted.Jesus.
It's nothing to do with tolerance.
White people, for years, blacked up to mock or impersonate black people. That's racist. The Senegal fans in question have used a white background so that the green "SENEGAL" stands out - because it wouldn't on black skin.
FFS
Stop trying to be reasonable. Discussion of anyone’s skin colour/cultural norms means you’re a racist. You racist. Posted by a mixed race guy.Well yes, you might well have! So, which hues of skin tone have the inaliable right to put make up on to change the colour of their faces? I'm sure the Senegalise fans are doing it for fun, with no racism or hatred towards anyone - why on earth should anyone be offended? No reasonable tolerant person would be.
So, it's OK for some but not for others - that's hardly good liberalism, equality and tolerance.
P.S. As a kind and gentle soul, who looks to love and respect all my brothers and sisters on this earth, I fully expect, and am immune to, storms of vitriol from those that are actually less tolerant than I.
Senegal played a very strong press for most of the first half - Sarr in particular was sprinting everywhere - and that made it very difficult, but we kept it *relatively* tidy and didn't concede. After Senegal tired a bit we had much more room to play in.The first 35 minutes were nervy and cumbersome, then lighting quick we were 2 up.
we dominated the game, I think we are capable of beating France, however we need to cut out those mistakes we made in the first 35 minutes, there were some very sloppy passes that went astray, that luckily we were not punished for.
Roll on Saturday…
I’ve seen to many false dawns to get my hopes up, but….
well played
It's very easy to predict what some will be saying over the next few days:Seems the knockers are now onto the guaranteed fact that we will 100% get shown up against France.
Must feel terrible that so many have been proved wrong
On we march
He's made joining up and playing for the national team a fun experience again. From day 1 the PR difference was remarkable. It used to be 'them and us' with the England team and the media. The players had been screwed over so many times that they had put up this wall.Genuine question. Why do people think Southgate has succeeded where other (frankly more respected) managers have failed? I mean, I don't agree with a lot of his squad selections, he appears slow to find his best team once we're in the tournament, and when things do go wrong, he rarely makes the right changes to swing the game in our favour. What's more, I'd still shudder if he was ever appointed the Albion, despite being from Sussex himself.
And yet, for all that, he's outperformed every past England manager with the exception of Alf Ramsay. It isn't luck - he's done it in the last two tournaments and nobody is writing off England in this one because we do score goals under Southgate.
So what is his secret? I can only think he picks players he trusts to be good squad people despite not necessarily being good enough (I'm looking at Henderson and Maguire here) and they repay his faith for that. The media problems are also a thing of the past under Southgate - that can't be a coincidence. But why?
Also the endless list of other "big" nations who don't get the results they should. It simply isn't how football works, especially tournament football with one-off, knockout games.But that’s not how it works, is it? What about Iceland in 2016? Failing to make it out of the group in 2014? Our capitulation against Germany in 2010? Not even making the Euros in 2008, or the World Cup in 1994?
Genuine question. Why do people think Southgate has succeeded where other (frankly more respected) managers have failed? I mean, I don't agree with a lot of his squad selections, he appears slow to find his best team once we're in the tournament, and when things do go wrong, he rarely makes the right changes to swing the game in our favour. What's more, I'd still shudder if he was ever appointed the Albion, despite being from Sussex himself.
And yet, for all that, he's outperformed every past England manager with the exception of Alf Ramsay. It isn't luck - he's done it in the last two tournaments and nobody is writing off England in this one because we do score goals under Southgate.
So what is his secret? I can only think he picks players he trusts to be good squad people despite not necessarily being good enough (I'm looking at Henderson and Maguire here) and they repay his faith for that. The media problems are also a thing of the past under Southgate - that can't be a coincidence. But why?
It's a good question and no I can't answer it. He DOES pick his favourites, not on players on form, he CAN be out-thought by better game managers, he IS often over-cautious .... and yet he's won as many tournament knock-out games in 4 years than all his predecessors combined managed in 48, and his tournament record reads (currently) semi-finals, finals, and quarter-finals - and maybe further.Genuine question. Why do people think Southgate has succeeded where other (frankly more respected) managers have failed? I mean, I don't agree with a lot of his squad selections, he appears slow to find his best team once we're in the tournament, and when things do go wrong, he rarely makes the right changes to swing the game in our favour. What's more, I'd still shudder if he was ever appointed the Albion, despite being from Sussex himself.
And yet, for all that, he's outperformed every past England manager with the exception of Alf Ramsay. It isn't luck - he's done it in the last two tournaments and nobody is writing off England in this one because we do score goals under Southgate.
So what is his secret? I can only think he picks players he trusts to be good squad people despite not necessarily being good enough (I'm looking at Henderson and Maguire here) and they repay his faith for that. The media problems are also a thing of the past under Southgate - that can't be a coincidence. But why?
I think along with any good qualities Southgate possesses, we have also massively underperformed at points, especially between 1996-2010.Genuine question. Why do people think Southgate has succeeded where other (frankly more respected) managers have failed? I mean, I don't agree with a lot of his squad selections, he appears slow to find his best team once we're in the tournament, and when things do go wrong, he rarely makes the right changes to swing the game in our favour. What's more, I'd still shudder if he was ever appointed the Albion, despite being from Sussex himself.
And yet, for all that, he's outperformed every past England manager with the exception of Alf Ramsay. It isn't luck - he's done it in the last two tournaments and nobody is writing off England in this one because we do score goals under Southgate.
So what is his secret? I can only think he picks players he trusts to be good squad people despite not necessarily being good enough (I'm looking at Henderson and Maguire here) and they repay his faith for that. The media problems are also a thing of the past under Southgate - that can't be a coincidence. But why?
It's on the beeb as Strictly has moved to Sunday.The France game is also on ITV, so let's hope so.
Great question, and some excellent answers so far.Genuine question. Why do people think Southgate has succeeded where other (frankly more respected) managers have failed? I mean, I don't agree with a lot of his squad selections, he appears slow to find his best team once we're in the tournament, and when things do go wrong, he rarely makes the right changes to swing the game in our favour. What's more, I'd still shudder if he was ever appointed the Albion, despite being from Sussex himself.
And yet, for all that, he's outperformed every past England manager with the exception of Alf Ramsay. It isn't luck - he's done it in the last two tournaments and nobody is writing off England in this one because we do score goals under Southgate.
So what is his secret? I can only think he picks players he trusts to be good squad people despite not necessarily being good enough (I'm looking at Henderson and Maguire here) and they repay his faith for that. The media problems are also a thing of the past under Southgate - that can't be a coincidence. But why?