How is anti semitism amusing?It's really rather amusing, as I said a few pages back
Not Starmer's fault and he has done everything right, but disturbing to see racism anywhere in politics surely?
How is anti semitism amusing?It's really rather amusing, as I said a few pages back
anti semitism amusing
Don't accuse a poster of finding anti-semitism amusing when you have ZERO evidence for it. You should retract this comment immediately.How is anti semitism amusing?
Not Starmer's fault and he has done everything right, but disturbing to see racism anywhere in politics surely?
My opinion (and this is the wrong thread for it) is that people should be given the benefit of the doubt in the event of single missteps but if further evidence of a pattern of behaviour emerges then that’s a different story. That appears to be what happened in this scenario and the party acted accordingly. It begs questions of the local party who chose him as a candidate, but the idea it reflects on the wider party or Starmer is ludicrous IMHO.This is the main headline on The Guardian website right now:
Labour handling of Azhar Ali ‘shambolic’, says antisemitism report author
Anyone got any opinions on this?
My apologies if I misread your postWe can all edit people's posts to change the meaning before quoting them, but don't expect to be taken seriously
I wouldn't describe this as corruption, more complacency and lack of professionalism. These people should be proud to serve the public, they really should be policing themselves. I am all in favour of having politicians in places where they have industry expertise, and if they DO have industry expertise there there's a good chance they'll have either an equity stake OR close connections with firms that will be affected.More corruption. Oozing out of every pore.
Tory MP failed to declare wife’s BP shares during oil and gas debates, standards commissioner finds
Watchdog finds three debates in which £50,000 shares ‘might reasonably’ have been thought to influence David Duguid’s actionswww.theguardian.com
Or maybe not…Well this is interesting.
I can imagine that Tory HQ are absolutely delighted with geebeebies.
Or maybe not…
So a second Labour MP has been suspended today over anti-Semitic remarks. Main headline on The Guardian front page (that’s right, The Guardian, not the Mail, or Telegraph or Sun etc) says this: ‘Labour in turmoil as party ditches second candidate over Israel views’.My opinion is that your posts are getting more desperate by the day. It's really rather amusing, as I said a few pages back
Still less of a problem than the Tories appear to have with sex offenders in their ranks the last couple of years though eh!So a second Labour MP has been suspended today over anti-Semitic remarks. The party still has a big problem whichever way you look at it, despite Starmer’s admirable attempts to deal with it in the past
Whereas the Tories don't bother suspending or reprimanding Councillors, MPs, or even PMs for antisemitism or racist remarks. Is that a better approach?So a second Labour MP has been suspended today over anti-Semitic remarks. The party still has a big problem whichever way you look at it, despite Starmer’s admirable attempts to deal with it in the past
This. Starmer acted.My opinion (and this is the wrong thread for it) is that people should be given the benefit of the doubt in the event of single missteps but if further evidence of a pattern of behaviour emerges then that’s a different story. That appears to be what happened in this scenario and the party acted accordingly. It begs questions of the local party who chose him as a candidate, but the idea it reflects on the wider party or Starmer is ludicrous IMHO.
Should someone be barred from office if they were found to chant “Go get your father’s gun and shoot the Palace scum” in the North stand? I don’t think so. Actually taking a gun to Croydon and waving it about, however…
He is dealing with it in the present.So a second Labour MP has been suspended today over anti-Semitic remarks. Main headline on The Guardian front page (that’s right, The Guardian, not the Mail, or Telegraph or Sun etc) says this: ‘Labour in turmoil as party ditches second candidate over Israel views’.
Do you think their reporting is ‘desperate’ too?
Glaswegian for Vaccine injured.Did he call himself a “vaccine Angel”?
Or indeed anti-muslim 'jokes' *cough*Whereas the Tories don't bother suspending or reprimanding Councillors, MPs, or even PMs for antisemitism or racist remarks. Is that a better approach?
Changing PM will change everything.
Changing PM will change everything.