GoldWithFalmer
Seaweed! Seaweed!
I have not felt the way i am currently feeling about Brighton since 1995.............
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
thread removed
- Thread starter littlehampton seagull
- Start date
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Bozza has moved it back.
Rookie
Greetings
- Feb 8, 2005
- 12,083
Come on its nowhere near that that bad, what ever is said we still finished 4th in the second tier.
HAILSHAM SEAGULL
Well-known member
- Nov 9, 2009
- 10,348
Bozza has reinstated the thread
littlehampton seagull
Banned
- Thread starter
- #45
Mods on here used to be great think some of the new ones think its cool to ban people and make a show of it.Its a very sad day when 2 harmless and enjoyable threads are removed just because a mod posts I agree with the one poster no one agreed with
GoldWithFalmer
Seaweed! Seaweed!
No i know it's not,but i has taken me back to those times,all the in- fighting,the secrecy and so forth.
Krusty
Active member
- Sep 9, 2006
- 622
Yeah - it's an embarrassing disgrace
And you get an INFRACTION for posting that? What has become of this place??
It seems we need to doth our cap to the money making machine that is BHAFC now . Great people have been shuffled to the side, Dick Knight, people who are hugely responsible for us even being at Falmer. The Henfield One and Lord Bracknell are now side stepped. The latter absolutely destroying Anne De Vecchi at the Lewes enquiry and now it seems forgotten with the head of secruity in particular treating him like a piece of trash. I am saddened these great men are now not given the regard they deserve as without Knight, Samrah, Bassford et all we would not even be at the Amex.
littlehampton seagull
Banned
- Thread starter
- #49
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
Interesting that one of the people who SAVED the albion, and yes, for all you doubters out there, if it wasn't for the likes of Paul Samrah, we would be bobbling in the arse end of the conference as AFC Brighton, he gets his thread removed because he is unhappy with what is going on.
Shameful
If its back then good.....perhaps the mod who removed it needs to look at himself
Shameful
If its back then good.....perhaps the mod who removed it needs to look at himself
I've largely been off NSC over the last day or two, but it's time to set a few things straight...
1. I and I alone are aware of some specifics to do with what is being analysed on NSC by various parties currently. I'm no legal expert but it's my "name above the door" and for that reason I am guarded. I also don't want to be in a position where I am asked to hand over user details to a third party due to a wish to take legal action against what some have posted on here.
2. As such I have asked the moderators to adopt a 'better safe than sorry' approach.
3. The moderators have a largely thankless task on NSC, putting in a lot of time and effort for no reward.
4. I put the moderators where they are, they are trying to follow my 'rules' and get sniped at by people who don't consider that position.
5. I've threatened it before, but I mean it now: I'm not going to be shy in my actions towards the few snide wankers who seem to delight in picking on the moderators at nearly every opportunity they can. They put a lot more into this site and community than you do, so I will have no qualms in removing you from here, with no notice and forever. If you have a problem with some moderating then PM me or email me. I'll look into it. Publicly bashing the mods is not going to see you being an active member of NSC for much longer.
1. I and I alone are aware of some specifics to do with what is being analysed on NSC by various parties currently. I'm no legal expert but it's my "name above the door" and for that reason I am guarded. I also don't want to be in a position where I am asked to hand over user details to a third party due to a wish to take legal action against what some have posted on here.
2. As such I have asked the moderators to adopt a 'better safe than sorry' approach.
3. The moderators have a largely thankless task on NSC, putting in a lot of time and effort for no reward.
4. I put the moderators where they are, they are trying to follow my 'rules' and get sniped at by people who don't consider that position.
5. I've threatened it before, but I mean it now: I'm not going to be shy in my actions towards the few snide wankers who seem to delight in picking on the moderators at nearly every opportunity they can. They put a lot more into this site and community than you do, so I will have no qualms in removing you from here, with no notice and forever. If you have a problem with some moderating then PM me or email me. I'll look into it. Publicly bashing the mods is not going to see you being an active member of NSC for much longer.
Good on him
Both threads
Both threads?
Was the other one the Littlehampton Gazette thread? I was enjoying it yesterday morning and went to the cricket and it disappeared. I am unclear as to the reason as the debate was passionate but well presented. Just interested.
littlehampton seagull
Banned
- Thread starter
- #53
No two threads in last hour have gone awol
BensGrandad
New member
Could it be that people are not happy to just accept a one sided argument and are asking questions. I think that it is a case of people wanting to be told something that appears to be remotely conceivable as the suspensions dont as every manage is self promoting, unless in the position that Sir Alex was.
Hatterlovesbrighton
something clever
A fair post. IMO you should use some NSC money to get a legal opinion on what you should and shouldn't do.
Thanks...
littlehampton seagull
Banned
- Thread starter
- #57
That's what we were saying in the thread that a certain poster should stop saying he knew stuff as this might harm nsc and put it in a legal wrangle.sorry but it was a mod that said he agreed with that poster and removed the thread.until then there was no mod basing,name calling etc just healthy debate.
Large threads are a pain to moderate and clean up - deciding what are 'bad' posts, deleting those posts, deleting the quotes of those posts, deleting the quotes of the quotes of those posts. I'll never have an issue with a moderator who thinks "this is going to take too long" and just remove the whole thread. I'd do the same. 15 seconds versus 10 minutes - my time has some value.
ees complicated no?
New member
Cool story, but I don't think it was like that at all.
littlehampton seagull
Banned
- Thread starter
- #60
Been talking to your source again but can't us what he said.