tedebear
Legal Alien
Is it useful to televise the fact that the emergency services were agressive to each other? That a firemen thought paramedics are just bus drivers to remove injured people to hospital?
Not good imho!
Not good imho!
Is the truth really in the public interest?
Is it useful to televise the fact that the emergency services were agressive to each other? That a firemen thought paramedics are just bus drivers to remove injured people to hospital?
Not good imho!
Is the truth really in the public interest?
Is the truth really in the public interest?
I suspect, in this case, that there has been a hell of a lot of agonising about what sort of evidence was relevant. And a lot of cross-checking of witness statements. And a lot of pre-inquest arguments between lawyers.WHY do these inquests happen so long after the event?
Maybe they were just following agreed procedures, rather than their own feelings?is the fact that members of certain organisations cared more for "elf an safety" and their own welfare, rather than going to aid of causalties?
Jesus, ive read some old shit in my time but this breaks new ground
Same statement goes for you. Is publishing the truth to the entire world a good thing? Is it not better that it is left to the emergency services and MI5/6 or whomever to deal with behind closed doors?
How helpful is it that a firefighter viewed the first arriving ambulance man as simple a means to ferry people to hospital?