Sussex v Glamorgan

[sams dad]

I'm not totally sure this is right, they kept changine runs (back or forwards) and overs left, but one thing for sure is we lost a wicket. (I think)

According to BBC the wicket went down at 195 - if Sussex only needed 194 to win how did we lose a wicket at 195, and then bat on to 197

 

[Happy Seagull]

Good to see license fee money being well spent

 

[Jarvo]

Just back from the County Ground. Matt Prior was amazing and its a good win with the G&G final coming up on Saturday.

Our batting is in great form, but I just hope our bowling can hold it together, as we've been conceeding quite a few runs lately.

 

[Wozza]

Pro40 D1 Table
NatWest Pro40 - Division One

P W L T N/R R/R Pts
1 Essex 5 3 1 0 1 1.69 7.0
2 Sussex 4 3 1 0 0 0.42 6.0
3 Glamorgan 5 1 1 1 2 -0.4 5.0
4 Northamptonshire 4 2 2 0 0 -0.63 4.0
5 Middlesex 5 2 3 0 0 -1.05 4.0
6 Durham 4 1 1 1 1 -0.0 4.0
7 Warwickshire 4 1 2 0 1 0.2 3.0
8 Nottinghamshire 3 1 1 0 1 -0.08 3.0
9 Lancashire 4 0 2 0 2 -0.32 2.0

It's on!

 

[Trigger]

What a fine Sussex display today, was well worth getting soaked for when the heavens opened 3 times!!!

Wozza looks set to be buying me a pint...

 

[dougdeep]

We won anyway. They'll be abandoning the test match next.

 

[Trigger]

According to BBC the wicket went down at 195 - if Sussex only needed 194 to win how did we lose a wicket at 195, and then bat on to 197

Mr Duckworth Lewis added a few extra runs to compensate Glam as they didn't know it was going to be reduced overs when they started batting... Monty crashed a 4 first ball and wiped that out straight away!

 

[Basil Fawlty]

Well done Sharks, bring on Lancashite.