[NSC] Premier League 12-15/1/23

[Neville's Breakfast]

View attachment 155777

Apparently this isn’t interfering.

What that snapshot doesn’t show is that he was slowing up at that point. It was up to the defenders to make the challenge. It’s all about opinions.

 

[pb21]

What that snapshot doesn’t show is that he was slowing up at that point. It was up to the defenders to make the challenge. It’s all about opinions.

If Rashford is slowing he is forcing the City player to slow down too.

 

[Neville's Breakfast]

If Rashford is slowing he is forcing the City player to slow down too.

Not if the defender makes a challenge. If that happened then Rashford would be interfering. Disclaimer that it’s only how I as a football fan would like the interpretation. I’m not a ref. I just thought it was clever from Rashford.

 

[pb21]

Not if the defender makes a challenge. If that happened then Rashford would be interfering. Disclaimer that it’s only how I as a football fan would like the interpretation. I’m not a ref. I just thought it was clever from Rashford.

The law is currently on BBC:

Surely Rashford is either:

1. Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision or

4. Making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball

 

[Neville's Breakfast]

The law is currently on BBC:
View attachment 155782

Surely Rashford is either:

1. Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision or

4. Making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball

Well, it’s clearly subjective because I disagree on every point. The ref and VAR also interpreted it the way I did.

 

[pb21]

Well, it’s clearly subjective because I disagree on every point. The ref and VAR also interpreted it the way I did.

Do you think that if Rashford hadn't been there, Fernandes would have still scored?

 

[Neville's Breakfast]

Do you think that if Rashford hadn't been there, Fernandes would have still scored?

He was there. Neither of us can know so it’s subjective. Sorry, that’s football. It’s not a computer game. It was a great goal and very intelligent from Rashford not to touch the ball.

 

[Acker79]

 

[Springal]

 

[GT49er]

On this interpretation of the rule - shouldn't Mac Allister's cracker have stood against Leicester?

Don't be silly! One was Manchester United (must be given - even after the final whistle in some cases....) and the other was . errrmmm .... Brighton and something, wasn't it? Hmmm ..... how can we find a way to disallow it?

Do get with the message!!

 

[Bodian]

Basically, if Rashford hadn't been there, one of the defenders would have tidied up before Fernandez got anywhere near the ball. Therefore he must have been interfering.

 

[dazzer6666]

Another questionable VAR decision…..looked to me like Trippier was stood on by Decordova-Reid before the foul, but maybe justice done as Mitro makes a massive mess of the pen with a ‘double hit’. Can’t remember the last time I saw that happen.

 

[A1X]

Watching on mute, what was wrong with that penalty?

 

[dazzer6666]

Watching on mute, what was wrong with that penalty?

Kicked it twice - as he shot, he slipped and the ball hit his other foot.

 

[Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo]

Watching on mute, what was wrong with that penalty?

He slipped as he kicked the ball, it then hit his standing foot. This means he touched it twice, you can’t do that from a penalty, even accidentally.

 

[Paulie Gualtieri]

Potter 1 up

 

[PTC Gull]

I see Jerry Seinfeld is the ref for the Chelski/Palarse game.

 

[Gabbafella]

Lee Hughes looks like Milky from Me, Myself & Irene.

 

[kevo]

Toon score

 

[brighton_tom]

Wanted a draw but I guess a Palace loss is always enjoyable...