- Aug 24, 2020
- 6,843
Hypothetical questions addressed to @Stat Brother, and discussions around dual-use paths both miss the point.
The gravamen of this completely needless death, is that the pedestrian has been convicted of manslaughter. Whether she felt entitled to occupy the width of the path, or suffers from anger issues, or whether her disabilities can/should ameliorate her sentence, are peripheral.
The woman has been convicted of manslaughter. She gave a dishonest account at interview, and showed no remorse at all. She is now considering an appeal.
Having killed somebody, she still believes her actions were justified. She is a danger to the public.
The gravamen of this completely needless death, is that the pedestrian has been convicted of manslaughter. Whether she felt entitled to occupy the width of the path, or suffers from anger issues, or whether her disabilities can/should ameliorate her sentence, are peripheral.
The woman has been convicted of manslaughter. She gave a dishonest account at interview, and showed no remorse at all. She is now considering an appeal.
Having killed somebody, she still believes her actions were justified. She is a danger to the public.