Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Liz Truss **RESIGNS 20/10/2022**



raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
5,995
Wiltshire
Believe that figure is now very outdated. They spent a bundle this morning on inflation-linked bonds, and at massive interest rates.

There's starting to be predictions that the entire mini-budget might be the next Truss u-turn, because they just can't see how it can funded in a way that will stabilise the markets.

But Shirley they can just put a wage freeze on public service workforce, and severely reduce funding of social services, NHS etc... that might help save their skins, I mean balance the budget
 








Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
13,043
Central Borneo / the Lizard
And more good news.

The "no-fault" eviction policy - due to become law next year - may be dropped.

And if that wasn't enough, rules are to be relaxed regarding the obligation on developers to build "affordable" housing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63215265

That's the Tories for ya. I'm all right jack and **** the rest of you.

they're not even pretending any more
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,414
As I understand it Argentina has always had huge problems with inflation (and at times a relatively worthless peso) this has led to a reliance on foreign currency and particularly the dollar. As soon as that happens a country no longer is monetary sovereign.

using foreign currency is a consequence of poor policy leading to inflation, devalued currency. if MMT holds, the presence of a central bank, with control of money and monetary policy, should be sufficent to have monetary sovereignty. the government can create money, use tax for contolling inflation right?

In terms of your thought experiment, as soon as a sovereign country shares a central bank then (from a MMT perspective) it gives up its monetary sovereignty. I think most MMT economists would probably therefore advise Scotland to adopt its own currency, and have its own central bank, if it were to become independent.

you dont see a little bit of a problem that a stoke of a pen, a tick of a clock, transforms a monetary system?
 


Audax

Boing boing boing...
Aug 3, 2015
2,999
Uckfield
Believe that figure is now very outdated. They spent a bundle this morning on inflation-linked bonds, and at massive interest rates.

When I wrote this post earlier, I almost included a line (wrote it then deleted it) stating that I had a feeling the BoE wasn't using it's full budget more because the markets weren't engaging with it (a lack of gilts being offered for the bank to buy). That's actually now looking confirmed from reports this afternoon about today's activity: they bought nearly £2b worth of inflation-linked bonds this morning, a further £1.4b of regular gilts, and rejected offers to buy a further nearly £0.5b worth (BoE can either accept or reject depending on whether what's been offered as seen as suitable for maintaining orderly markets).

I suspect if the BoE had received a higher volume of offers it saw as suitable, it would have bought them - looks to me like BoE activity is being constrained by supply rather than demand. They'd buy more if more was offered, they're just not getting the offers.
 


BenGarfield

Active member
Feb 22, 2019
317
crawley
Also a very detailed explanation of how UK government finance actually works I recommend An Accountancy Model of the UK Exchequer published by GIMMS www.gimms.co.uk. This is a meticulous ground-breaking paper which examines exactly how governments finances actually work
 




Half Time Pies

Well-known member
Sep 7, 2003
1,417
Brighton
using foreign currency is a consequence of poor policy leading to inflation, devalued currency. if MMT holds, the presence of a central bank, with control of money and monetary policy, should be sufficent to have monetary sovereignty. the government can create money, use tax for contolling inflation right?



you dont see a little bit of a problem that a stoke of a pen, a tick of a clock, transforms a monetary system?

MMT doesn't protect countries from poor financial management and exchange rate risk! If you think thats the case then you don't understand it, interest rates and inflation still have to be managed effectively.

If your currency devalues to the point when it loses its primacy and you have to effectively adopt another countries currency, then (from a MMT perspective) you have lost your monetary sovereignty. I really don't see that happening in the US, UK, Canada or Japan, do you?!
 


drew

Drew
Oct 3, 2006
23,126
Burgess Hill
All this detailed monetarist theory talk (MTT) is all well and good but can't this thread get back on track with the main theme being that Liz Truss is an ignorant unempathetic economy destroying cow (IUEDC)?
 


BenGarfield

Active member
Feb 22, 2019
317
crawley
All this detailed monetarist theory talk (MTT) is all well and good but can't this thread get back on track with the main theme being that Liz Truss is an ignorant unempathetic economy destroying cow (IUEDC)?

MMT analysis is fundamentally opposed to what she is doing so it’s entirely relevant
 




usernamed

New member
Aug 31, 2017
763
MMT doesn't protect countries from poor financial management and exchange rate risk! If you think thats the case then you don't understand it, interest rates and inflation still have to be managed effectively.

If your currency devalues to the point when it loses its primacy and you have to effectively adopt another countries currency, then (from a MMT perspective) you have lost your monetary sovereignty. I really don't see that happening in the US, UK, Canada or Japan, do you?!

You’re absolutely right with regard to Argentina, they tried to create a currency board that implemented a one to one currency peg between the peso and the US dollar. It ended in disaster, primarily because politicians saw it as a short cut to enrichment and meddled so it did things that a currency board shouldn’t do. (Lend to government, bail out commercial banks etc.) Google “convertibility plan Argentina” if you’re interested.

For any nation with a poor economic history that is trying to attract investment, lenders may be choosy about the currency they choose to lend in. If your own currency has a history of hyperinflation then international lenders may only be willing to lend in USD or their currency of choice. Hence that country does not have monetary sovereignty.

In such a scenario, you’re fine while your domestic currency is stable and follows a similar growth profile to the USD, but if your currency plummets in value, and your USD reserves become depleted, you’re in a pickle.

Let’s hope this lot aren’t quite stupid enough to allow any of our debt to be priced in someone else’s currency.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,414
MMT doesn't protect countries from poor financial management and exchange rate risk! If you think thats the case then you don't understand it, interest rates and inflation still have to be managed effectively.

If your currency devalues to the point when it loses its primacy and you have to effectively adopt another countries currency, then (from a MMT perspective) you have lost your monetary sovereignty. I really don't see that happening in the US, UK, Canada or Japan, do you?!

no i dont think this, it is what you infer, when you dismissed a country with sovereign money from the discussion. saying a country using another's currency no longer has monetary sovereignty. its changeing the rules, the definitions, to step around the problem. they have control of their currency, so MMT must apply if it is valid.

its good to raise that MMT doesnt protect from poor policy, what does it say we should do right now?
 
Last edited:










knocky1

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2010
13,018
I've also looked into MMT and it seems very apt for the post Brexit Tory UK.

Screenshot_20221011-182718_YouTube.jpg
 








Half Time Pies

Well-known member
Sep 7, 2003
1,417
Brighton
no i dont think this, it is what you infer, when you dismissed a country with sovereign money from the discussion. saying a country using another's currency is no longer has monetary sovereignty. its changeing the rules, the definitions, to step around the problem. they have control of their currency, so MMT must apply if it is valid.

its good to raise that MMT doesnt protect from poor policy, what does it say we should do right now?

It's not a case of trying to change the rules it's simply that the description doesn't fit. MMT came about as a descriptor of the US system, its subsequently been found to apply in other countries with similar characteristics like Canada, UK and Japan. One of the reasons that these countries can always create money to pay debt liabilities is because all their debt is denominated in their own currency. Thats not the case in Argentina and thats why the model doesn't fit.

MMT doesn't say anything about what we should do now! I think an understanding of MMT changes the narrative and makes different policy choices possible. It doesn't however answer political questions or prescribe policy. It just explains how money works.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here