I am sorry to say, as much as I would like Colwill to stay, some parts of these posts are looking more and more like the ones I saw on the Leeds fan site a couple of years ago discussing Ben White...
He is Chelsea's player! They hold the cards!
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Levi Colwill
- Thread starter Solid at the back
- Start date
He is Chelsea's player! They hold the cards!
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
Agreed, if Poch digs his heels in, which it appears he has, it will take a brave move from owners who have overseen one f*** up after another in the last 12 months, to deny their new manager his wish. Shame that Poch does seem to favour promoting promising youngsters to his first team. It would take Colwill being very difficult and demanding a transfer to have any chance imo.
A slight difference , Levi is happy at BHAFC and loves Brighton , Ben White for some reason liked Leeds 
maresfield seagull
Well-known member
- May 23, 2006
- 2,261
SAME reason
successful team enjoyed the football and actually getting to play regularly
I would bet Levi would be a better RB than Ben a LB ?
Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 15,051
Hang on, five minutes ago the consensus was that Poch wanted to keep him as part of the Chelsea squad - and now he's happy to farm him out again for the season?
It's *almost* as if no-one's got a scooby about the whole thing!
It's *almost* as if no-one's got a scooby about the whole thing!
nwgull
Well-known member
That is not suggested at all by that article. All it says is the following at the end:
Chelsea plot moves for Moisés Caicedo and Manuel Ugarte in midfield rebuild
Chelsea’s rebuild of their midfield will see them combine their move for Sporting Lisbon’s Manuel Ugarte with an attempt to sign Moisés Caicedowww.theguardian.com
Not sure it's been posted, but reports that they would be open to loaning him to us again as part of a deal for Caicedo.
‘It remains to be seen whether Brighton renew attempts to sign Levi Colwill from Chelsea. Colwill has just finished a season’s loan at Brighton, who had a £30m bid for the defender rejected this week. Chelsea do not want to sell the 20-year-old.’
crookie
Well-known member
Agree, likely he stays, problem for Chelsea is that who is going to take Koulibaly at £200k a week off their hands ?
Garry Nelson's Left Foot
Well-known member
Guys, can we stop trying to bin Caicedo off. Especially to Chelsea. And extra especially in a f***ing player swap.
Stumpy Tim
Well-known member
That's a terrible deal. Caicedo is a £100m player
JetsetJimbo
Well-known member
- Jun 13, 2011
- 979
I'm actually starting to get curious about whoever's next on Tony and Paul's list for the LCB position. Obviously Colwill is first choice because he already knows the setup, but the club must have other targets, and signing one of them will likely be more achievable.
Hove Lagoonery
Well-known member
- Dec 16, 2008
- 1,039
Only in Chelsea's eyes! The best offer we've had for him is £70m, no?
Hove Lagoonery
Well-known member
- Dec 16, 2008
- 1,039
Erm... isn't the head of recruitment 'Sam'?
Last edited:
maresfield seagull
Well-known member
- May 23, 2006
- 2,261
I would be surprised if either RDZ or Arteta ever played them in those positions tbf given the opportunity to do so
Has Levi even played as a FB for us ? LB even ?
From what I’ve seen of both I d say Ben White is more versatile position wise
- May 8, 2018
- 9,500
Maybe accept a compromise and sign with a decent buy back clause after 24 months (that also expires)
Chelsea get the profit for their accounts now, we get Levi for a couple of years and if they want him back we make c30-50% profit?
Chelsea get the profit for their accounts now, we get Levi for a couple of years and if they want him back we make c30-50% profit?
Stumpy Tim
Well-known member
And we rejected it for a reason.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,201
We don't like players that do that so I really hope he doesn't.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,201
Why does that matter, it's the off season. Time to speculate about players and clubs motives, actions and wishes without having a clue about anything.
The best thing to do is then decide ones theories are fact and get really cross about it.
It's great fun.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,319
Anything thing I don’t think really exists - ‘playing conditions’. Only examples of this I know of are triggering extra years’ contract if you play x games or option to buy triggered etc. Never known anyone to have a ‘you will always be picked’ type clause - another myth imo…
Imagine being a manager and being told ‘you have to play him and him’. Wouldn’t happen.
Hove Lagoonery
Well-known member
- Dec 16, 2008
- 1,039
The reason being we wanted more games out of him. If Arsenal won't increase their bid and nobody betters it, then his value is £70m. But we shouldn't accept it. I'd prefer another season out of him (or at least to the January window) with the massive bonus that his worth could well soar to your valuation.
Last edited: