Why?If we want him to be a coach, then we should employ him as one. I don’t think we should sign him as a player for any longer, he sadly doesn’t have the legs anymore.
Why?
If he is here as a coach anyway, why is it better for him to NOT be registered as a player, in the event we want him to contribute on the pitch?
In that case, I refer you to Post #119Mainly wages. I expect he’ll get much less as a coach than he would on a playing contract. That money can go into buying replacements or keeping existing players we would rather not sell.
In that case, I refer you to Post #119
We have ZERO knowledge on what wages Lallana would expect to receive for an additional year of learning on the job, in a player / coach role.
I'd agree with this. A mate, who attended the Albion throughout lockdown (as a journalist), said he couldn't wait for crowds to come back because without them all you could hear was Lallana screaming for 90 mins. He just never let the standards drop.
He's a leader, he's embedded into the club superbly, and (whilst I've found myself frustrated by him on occasion) done a really good job for us. As @hans kraay fan club says, if it works for all parties, he'll stay.
As @hans kraay fan club said, there's no way that Lallana will be earning the wages that he was 4 years ago. And as I say, it's got to work for all parties. If he says that he is going to refuse a significant pay cut, then it's not going to work is it?That was 4 years ago. It's 4 years more injuries to an already injury prone player, 4 years older and less athletic, 4 years more knocks.
Yes he's been (and probably still is) instrumental for the youngsters. But he can hardly run and keep up with the play. Yes his nous does keep him from falling behind at the moment, but in another year?
I think we should be using the wages he'd be earning as a player, investing in younger players to fill key roles in the team. And move him over to a coaching role.
I felt that we kept the ball far better when he came on against Liverpool. This meant their attacks were more sporadic.Total luxury player.
Doesn't score or assist and can't play more than 45 minutes a week.
Lovely to watch, but he doesn't add anything to us, on the pitch, that others can't.
100 appearance at an average of 48 minutes per appearance, over 4 seasons.
2/3s of those minutes from his first two seasons.
It really is diminishing returns,
We really shouldn't be thinking of extending his contract
You mean he helped us hold on for a loss?I felt that we kept the ball far better when he came on against Liverpool. This meant their attacks were more sporadic.
He is just the kind of player you want to come on, sit and organise in those kind of situations.
Still a place for him as far as I am concerned.
It looked to me like he gave us a basis for a few more chances. So yeah, that kind of player.You mean he helped us hold on for a loss?
Surely the type of player we want to come on in those situations, is someone who can affect the game and create opportunities?
No?
We can't afford to buy the players we need, because we are paying wages to players who contribute 30 mins per appearance and in that period can only provide a basis for other players to create opportunities.It looked to me like he gave us a basis for a few more chances. So yeah, that kind of player.
Not sure what player was going to turn the game to the extent you are suggesting but my guess is we can't attract or afford him yet... In the mean time I am happy with Adam.
Yep, time for him to step sideways and join the coaching staff.We can't afford to buy the players we need, because we are paying wages to players who contribute 30 mins per appearance and in that period can only provide a basis for other players to create opportunities.
He' s a luxury player.
21/22 - Averaged 60 minutes per appearance
22/23 - averaged 45 minutes per appearance
23/24 - averaged 30 minutes per appearance
Great player - but he will be using up a squad berth and wages next season.
I know we are just posting opinions, but the more I think about it . . . .
We can't know what the man contributes.
Whether he stays or goes will be a matter for him and the club.
We can't petition the club to keep him or let him go. That would be silly.
Our outrage if he goes or stays won't matter.
For these reasons, I'm out.
If everyone took all of those factors into account for EVERY topic on NSC, this place would be like the MARY CELLESTEI know we are just posting opinions, but the more I think about it . . . .
We can't know what the man contributes.
Whether he stays or goes will be a matter for him and the club.
We can't petition the club to keep him or let him go. That would be silly.
Our outrage if he goes or stays won't matter.
For these reasons, I'm out.
I know.If everyone took all of those factors into account for EVERY topic on NSC, this place would be like the MARY CELLESTE